PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 21, 2025Behavioral Sciences & the Law2 citationsOpen Access

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Violence Risk Assessment: Emerging Technology and the Ethics of the Inevitable

View Full Paper
NHNeil R. HoganGCGabriela Corăbian

Key Points

  • Generative AI presents ethical challenges in violence risk assessment, emphasizing the importance of due caution.
  • Key ethical principles, including autonomy and justice, guide the analysis of generative AI's role in these assessments.
  • The manuscript discusses issues such as biased training data and its potential to exacerbate racial disparities in outcomes.
  • Continuous evaluation and research are recommended to ensure responsible usage of generative AI technologies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have stimulated considerable excitement and discussion regarding the potential impacts on people's lives and work. In particular, proposed and realized applications of generative AI have appeared across multiple industries and domains, including at the intersection of behavioral science and the law. This manuscript presents an ethical analysis of applications of generative AI to violence risk assessment, guided by the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and non‐maleficence, and justice. The authors argue that generative AI, although capable of producing novel content, is nonetheless vulnerable to ethical problems, including through its exposure to biased training data. Issues such as limited transparency in decision making and the potential for the perpetuation and exacerbation of racial disparities are discussed. The authors recommend that professionals approach generative AI with due caution, as they would with any novel or emerging risk assessment approach, and suggest continued evaluation and research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hogan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46ac231b076d99fa683a1https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Investigating racial disparities in violence risk assessment using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide–Version 3 (SARA-V3): Structured professional judgment ratings and recidivism among Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals.2024 · 16 citations
  2. 2Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures.2016 · 74 citations
  3. 3Violence Risk Scale (VRS)2019 · 15 citations
  4. 4The Psychology of Criminal Conduct2016 · 2,106 citations
  5. 5Assessing dynamic violence risk: Common language risk levels and recidivism rates for the Violence Risk Scale.2022 · 14 citations