PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology3 citationsOpen Access

Post-Activation Performance Enhancement of Lower Limb with Variable Resistance Back Squat at Different Depths

View Full Paper
CNChoon Yeow NgDLDanny Lum

Key Points

  • Performing parallel squat increased jump height significantly more than quarter squat, highlighting its effectiveness.
  • Countermovement depth and propulsion force were enhanced with quarter squat but reduced with parallel squat, showing differing impacts.
  • Both squat types enhanced jump performance metrics in trained athletes after short recovery, underscoring the potential of variable resistance.
  • Resistance trained athletes displayed different jump strategies following each squat condition, indicating varied biomechanical responses.

Abstract

This study compared the acute effect of performing quarter (QS) and parallel (PS) squat with variable resistance (VR) on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Fifteen resistance trained athletes (age: 27.0 ± 3.7 years, bodyweight: 68.4 ± 7.7 kg, height: 169.7 ± 6.9 cm) performed either the QS or PS to induce post-activation performance enhancement on two separate occasions. During each session, participants performed three repetitions of baseline CMJ prior to performing three repetitions of either QS or PS at their three-repetition maximum load. Participants then performed the post-test CMJ after a five-minute recovery period. Both conditions resulted in increased jump height (QS: p < 0.001, g = 0.19, PS: p < 0.001, g = 0.35). Countermovement depth and time to take-off were significantly decreased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.63 and p = 0.005, g = 0.30, respectively) but significantly increased in PS (p = 0.027, g = 0.39 and p < 0.001, g = 0.36, respectively). Mean propulsion force was significantly increased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.23) but significantly decreased in PS (p = 0.083, g = 0.13). PS resulted in greater change in jump height (p < 0.001, g = 1.34) and time to take-off (p = 0.005, g = 1.25), while QS resulted in greater change in countermovement depth (p < 0.001, g = 2.33) and mean propulsion force (p < 0.001, g = 1.67). The results showed that performing PS and QS with VR was effective in enhancing CMJ height. However, the two conditions resulted in participants adopting different jump strategies when performing the post-test CMJ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ng et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46cc631b076d99fa68c2ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030347
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper