PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Digital Health3 citationsOpen Access

Smartwatch-based ventilatory assessment for COPD screening: A diagnostic accuracy study

View Full Paper
YCYibing ChenLCLu CaoDZDahui Zhao

Key Points

  • The smartwatch-based model achieved 87.82% accuracy in detecting COPD using cough sounds and physiological data.
  • Machine learning algorithms showed significant correlation (r = 0.798, P < 0.001) between predicted and measured lung function parameters.
  • The study included 178 patients with COPD in the training cohort and validated findings using an independent group of 47 COPD patients.
  • The findings suggest the potential for scalable screening solutions that may alleviate healthcare burdens associated with undiagnosed COPD.

Abstract

COPD underdiagnosis persists in China due to limited spirometry access. Smart wearables enabling cough and physiological monitoring (SpO2, respiratory rate) offer a scalable screening solution. Participants were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts. All underwent cough sound recordings, smartwatch monitoring (heart rate variability, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation), and pre-/post-bronchodilator spirometry. Machine learning algorithms extracted cough sound features to predict lung function (evaluated via MAE, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis). These predictions were combined with physiological data in a multimodal COPD screening model, with diagnostic performance assessed against physician diagnosis. The training cohort included 178 patients (112 males) with COPD or pulmonary dysfunctions, aged 54.42 ± 14.77 years, BMI 24.81 ± 3.73 kg/m², FVC 3.64 ± 1.09 L, and FEV1 2.42 ± 0.96 L, alongside 298 healthy volunteers (151 males) aged 35.3 ± 12.35 years, BMI 22.62 ± 3.12 kg/m², FVC 3.63 ± 0.89 L, and FEV1 3.14 ± 0.73 L. The validation cohort comprised 47 COPD patients (35 males) aged 65.53 ± 7.62 years, BMI 25.38 ± 4.38 kg/m², FVC 3.27 ± 0.59 L, and FEV1 1.91 ± 0.50 L, and 71 healthy controls (27 males) aged 45.51 ± 12.15 years, BMI 25.79 ± 4.00 kg/m², FVC 3.35 ± 0.80 L, and FEV1 2.72 ± 0.67 L. Using cough sounds, the model's mean absolute error for FEV1/FVC, FVC%, and FEV1% prediction was 7.4%, 10.6%, and 17.78% ( Table 3 - 5), respectively, compared to spirometry. Significant correlations were found between predicted and measured FVC (r = 0.798, P < 0.001), FEV1 (r = 0.752, P < 0.001), and FEV1/FVC (r = 0.784, < 0.001) ( Table 6). Combined with physiological parameters, our model's overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for differentiating between COPD and normal controls were 87.82%, 86.96%, and 87.73% ( Table 9). Our wearable-based algorithm effectively screens for ventilatory dysfunction and COPD, showing potential for large-scale population screening to reduce medical burdens. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization ChiCTR2100050843; Registration Date: 2021-9-4 Clinical Trial Number: ChiCTR2100050843. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=126556.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46ccf31b076d99fa69225https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251377938
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper