PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Journal of Further and Higher Education0 citationsOpen Access

A multi-layered evaluation of university-wide education interventions to improve student engagement and retention

View Full Paper
SFSara de FreitasGCGuy J. CurtisSRStephen M. Ritchie

Key Points

  • Retention strategies significantly improved engagement, highlighting the value of targeted educational interventions.
  • The use of supplemental instruction had the greatest impact on retaining first-year students, with increased satisfaction reported.
  • A mixed methods approach, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data, bolstered the reliability of findings regarding student progression.
  • Cost-benefit modelling demonstrated the financial advantages for institutions implementing effective retention strategies, affirming their strategic importance.

Abstract

The strategic benefit of student retention is financial for institutions, economic for states and personal for individual students. Nonetheless, enacting and evaluating effective innovations to improve retention is challenging. This paper reports a multi-layered set of methods combining a quasi-experimental design, statistical methods with a dynamic learning analytic approach based upon baseline of data, multiple data sets and mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) to explore how student engagement, progression and retention were affected by learning interventions of different varieties deployed across a university. With a cross-university team including executive and faculty leadership, our strategy-guided intervention reached 65% of the university's first-year students (with 2,990 students from 36 modules/units, and 24 disciplines, involved in the study). Our main findings show that the most benefit in retention was gained by the use of supplemental instruction, which coincided with increased satisfaction of students' psychological needs as a proxy measure of engagement. Cost-benefit modelling indicated that our strategic interventions also led to substantial revenue gains. This paper provides a framework for higher educational institutions to evaluate similar programmes and demonstrates the efficacy of the programme that we assessed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Freitas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46cd731b076d99fa69517https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2025.2560999
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research1975 · 7,480 citations
  2. 2An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data1980 · 2,895 citations
  3. 3Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research1981 · 925 citations
  4. 4Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry2003 · 512 citations
  5. 5Qualities of Effective Teachers2018 · 268 citations