PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 20250 citations

Sevelamer vs. Calcium Acetate for Treating Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

View Full Paper
KLKang LiuJZJin ZhaoXWXue Wang

Key Points

  • Sevelamer demonstrates superior clinical efficacy when compared to calcium acetate in treating hyperphosphatemia.
  • Significant differences were observed in blood calcium, phosphorus levels, and FGF-23 before and after treatment with sevelamer.
  • Patients were randomly assigned to receive either calcium acetate or sevelamer for a duration of three months during maintenance hemodialysis.
  • Sevelamer may be preferred for clinical management due to its favorable effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and fewer adverse reactions.

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of sevelamer (SL) and calcium acetate (CA) in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and levels of peripheral blood fetuin-A and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23). A total of 92 ESRD patients attending the First Hospital of Zibo between January 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the CA group (46 cases) or the SL group (46 cases) using a random number table method. Patients in both groups received MHD and conventional treatment. Additionally, patients in the CA group were given CA, while those in the SL group were given SL, with the treatment continuing for 3 months. The outcome indicators were assessed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was clinical efficacy. The secondary outcome indicators included calcium-phosphorus metabolism indicators (blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and intact parathyroid hormone iPTH), coronary artery calcification score (CACs), serum biochemical indicators (including fetuin-A, FGF-23, and C-reactive protein CRP), and adverse reactions and cardiovascular events during the course of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the SL group and the CA group (P 0.05). SL demonstrates superior efficacy compared to CA in treating hyperphosphatemia in MHD patients. SL effectively regulates calcium-phosphorus metabolism, reduces CACs, regulates peripheral blood fetuin-A and FGF-23 levels, and leads to fewer adverse reactions. SL may be a preferred option for clinical management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46fbd31b076d99fa69875https://doi.org/10.12182/20250560605
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper