PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 22, 20250 citationsOpen Access

From Reasoning to Super-Intelligence: A Search-Theoretic Perspective

View Full Paper
SSShai Shalev‐ShwartzASAmnon Shashua

Key Points

  • The Diligent Learner efficiently learns from chain-of-thought data while addressing complex reasoning obstacles.
  • Core issues like distribution drift and exponential inference costs hinder existing approaches such as reinforcement learning.
  • This study introduces a novel framework that models reasoning as a depth-first search guided by validators.
  • Improved reasoning systems could significantly enhance the capabilities of large reasoning models in practical applications.

Abstract

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a powerful tool for enhancing the problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the theoretical foundations of learning from CoT data remain underdeveloped, and existing approaches -- such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Reinforcement Learning (RL), Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT), and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) -- often fail on complex reasoning tasks. In this work, we identify core obstacles that hinder effective CoT learning, including distribution drift, lack of embedded search, and exponential inference costs. We introduce the Diligent Learner, a new learning paradigm that explicitly models reasoning as a depth-first search guided by a validator and supports backtracking upon failure. Under two mild and realistic assumptions, we prove that the Diligent Learner can efficiently learn from CoT data while existing methods fail to do so. This framework offers a path toward building scalable and reliable reasoning systems trained on naturally occurring, incomplete data -- paving the way for the development of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with robust, interpretable problem-solving abilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shalev‐Shwartz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46fdc31b076d99fa6a649https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.15865
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep Hidden Cognition Facilitates Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning2025
  2. 2Non-Iterative Symbolic-Aided Chain-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning2025
  3. 3Think When You Need: Self-Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Learning2025
  4. 4The CoT Encyclopedia: Analyzing, Predicting, and Controlling how a Reasoning Model will Think2025
  5. 5Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs2024 · 6 citations