PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Arthritis & Rheumatology6 citationsOpen Access

Effect of time to start of biologic therapy on treatment response in childhood arthritis: Results from the UCAN CAN‐DU study

View Full Paper
JJJelleke B. de JongeSRSytze de RoockDSDieneke Schonenberg‐Meinema

Key Points

  • Early initiation of biologic therapy leads to a higher rate of inactive arthritis in children with JIA by 26%.
  • Among early starters, 83% achieved inactive arthritis compared to only 57% of late starters after six months.
  • Logistic regression analysis indicated that each month of delay in starting biologics increased the odds of ongoing arthritis by 9%.
  • Findings suggest a critical window for biologic therapy initiation to effectively manage juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Abstract

Objective To estimate the effect of time from symptom onset to start of biologic treatment on achieving inactive arthritis within six months in a cohort of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Methods The international UCAN CAN‐DU study prospectively enrolls JIA patients across Canada and the Netherlands. A nested cohort study was performed and biologic‐naive, non‐systemic JIA patients were included at the start of biologic therapy. The primary outcome was inactive arthritis at six months. Demographics, disease‐related parameters and treatment response were compared using (non)parametric tests between early (time symptom onset to biologic start: 0‐6 months), intermediate (7‐12 months) and late (13‐24 months) treatment groups. A logistic regression model analysed the effect of time to biologic start on the response at six months, adjusting for active joint count and physician global assessment. A graphical representation of the model was created. Results 130 children with JIA were included (early: n=35, intermediate: n =46, late; n=49), 66% were female and the median age at symptom onset was 11.0. The proportion of patients that reach inactive arthritis in the early starters (83%) was significantly higher than in late starters (57%). For each month of delay to the start of biologic treatment, the adjusted odds of having active arthritis after six months of therapy was 1.09 (Interquartile range: 1.02‐1.17, p=0.009). Conclusions Early start of biologic therapies in JIA patients was associated with a higher proportion of patients reaching inactive arthritis within 6 months, suggesting a window of opportunity to control disease activity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jonge et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4725631b076d99fa6b0e2https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Short‐Term Response to Biologic Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis Is Not Influenced by Disease Duration at Initiation of Therapy2026
  2. 2Treatment Patterns in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Retrospective Observational Health Claims Data Study2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Efficacy of biologic DMARDs in improving the clinical response of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a meta-analysis of RCTs2025
  4. 4Differences in time to drug initiation and inactive disease achievement by insurance type in patients with nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis2026
  5. 5Rheum for earlier recognition: patient reported time to diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis2026