PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 20250 citations

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Malignancy in Musculoskeletal Tumors Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

View Full Paper
TKTajdar Husain KhanNTNaila TamkeenFBFaryal Basheer

Key Points

  • MRI achieved a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 82.9% for detecting malignancy in musculoskeletal tumors.
  • Histopathology confirmed malignancy in 56 out of 97 patients, establishing a diagnostic accuracy of 88.7% for MRI.
  • Subgroup analyses revealed consistent MRI performance across age, sex, and other demographic variables.
  • Findings support MRI's role as a reliable non-invasive alternative to histopathology in oncological settings.

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal tumors represent a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping clinical and imaging features, while histopathology remains invasive and resource intensive. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with its superior soft-tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities, is widely used for characterization and surgical planning, yet variability in diagnostic performance necessitates further validation across diverse populations. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting malignancy in musculoskeletal tumors, using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study conducted at a tertiary-care radiology department in Peshawar, Pakistan, from June to November 2024, 97 consecutive patients aged 18–70 years with clinically suspected musculoskeletal tumors underwent MRI on 1.5T or 3T scanners followed by histopathological confirmation. Predefined MRI signal and enhancement criteria were applied to classify tumors as malignant or non-malignant. Diagnostic indices were derived from 2×2 contingency tables, and subgroup analyses were performed across demographic and clinical variables in accordance with STARD recommendations. Results: Histopathology confirmed malignancy in 56 cases (57.7%). MRI achieved a sensitivity of 92.9% (95% CI: 82.7–98.0), specificity of 82.9% (95% CI: 67.9–92.9), positive predictive value of 88.1%, negative predictive value of 89.5%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.7%. Diagnostic performance was consistent across age, sex, body mass index, residence, and occupational strata. Conclusion: MRI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal tumors and can serve as a reliable non-invasive adjunct to histopathology in global oncology practice. These findings support the integration of MRI into diagnostic pathways to reduce unnecessary biopsies and guide surgical decision-making, while multicenter research incorporating advanced sequences is warranted to further improve specificity and generalizability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4725631b076d99fa6b0f2https://doi.org/10.61919/qz59nj09
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Detecting Orbital Masses Keeping Histopathology as Gold Standard2024
  2. 2Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Evaluation of Uterine Masses in Detection of Uterine Carcinoma, Taking Histopathology as a Gold Standard2025
  3. 3Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Patients with Elevated PSA Levels in Predicting Prostatic Carcinoma, Keeping Histopathology as Gold Standard2023
  4. 4Accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing malignant musculoskeletal tumours2024
  5. 5Diagnostic Value of MRI Compared to Histopathological Results in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Masses2024 · 2 citations