PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics0 citationsOpen Access

Research funding challenges in Brazil: researchers' perceptions from a public institution of professional education

View Full Paper
CRC. Fontes RibeiroWCWoska Pires da CostaMSMarcos de Moraes Sousa

Key Points

  • Most researchers faced complex funding calls and limitations, which hindered project submissions and approvals.
  • Significant factors influencing submission rates included gender and academic level, with CNPq fellows more successful in submissions.
  • Proposal clarity and researchers' experience were critical for project approval, affecting the overall success of applications.
  • The findings advocate for gender-sensitive grant criteria and targeted support for underrepresented researchers in Brazil.

Abstract

Introduction In a global landscape characterized by intense competition and stringent funding criteria, researchers face the dual challenges of limited resources and high demand for innovation—a challenge that Brazil is no exception to. This study aimed to explore the perceptions, barriers, and challenges faced by researchers during the project submission process for approval by funding agencies, with a focus on schools within the Federal Network of Professional, Scientific, and Technological Education Institutions. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional approach was used to examine the characteristics of researchers at a Brazilian institution in 2023. The sample comprised eighty three researchers who completed an online questionnaire containing eighty three questions on demographic characteristics, factors associated with project submission and approval, and reasons for non-submission or non-approval. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including the Kolmogorov—Smirnov, Pearson's chi-square, and Mann—Whitney U -tests, followed by post hoc analysis and Yates' correction. Logistic regression was applied using the backward elimination method, and significant parameters ( p 0.20) free from multicollinearity were selected. Results This study revealed that most researchers were men (61.4%) with doctoral degrees (91.6%), highlighted the critical role of proposal clarity and relevance in the project evaluation process. Gender ( p = 0.011) and academic level ( p = 0.025) were significant factors influencing project submission rates, with Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development ( CNPq ) fellows and researchers involved in graduate programs submitting more projects. The participants identified “search for funding” and “desire to expand research impact” as their primary motivations while citing “complex funding calls” and “funding limitations” as major barriers. Additionally, age and the number of children were found to affect project approval ( p ≤ 0.018), with “proposal clarity” and “researchers' experience” having been critical factors for submission approval ( p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion The study results highlighted a gender disparity, with lower participation among women, and identified key factors influencing project submission, including the search for funding, curriculum development, and structural challenges. Additionally, the findings suggest the adoption of gender-sensitive and early-career grant criteria, targeted support for underrepresented researchers, and flexible mechanisms for those with caregiving responsibilities. These findings underscore the importance of public policies and institutional strategies in promoting equitable and inclusive funding opportunities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ribeiro et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4725d31b076d99fa6b59dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1553928
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!2015 · 127 citations
  2. 2The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Modeling Grant Competition between Universities2023 · 6 citations
  3. 3Production profiles in Brazilian Science, with special attention to social sciences and humanities2020 · 39 citations
  4. 4Gênero e desigualdade na academia brasileira: uma análise a partir dos bolsistas de produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq2021 · 25 citations
  5. 5Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness2005 · 75 citations