PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Frontiers in Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: insights from the New Zealand FIT for symptomatic pilot

View Full Paper
KSKai Sheng SawLNLu-ana NgataiCWCatharine Whiteside

Key Points

  • FIT identifies symptomatic patients at high risk for undiagnosed colorectal cancer, aiding urgent investigations.
  • At low f-Hb thresholds, sensitivity for colorectal cancer reached 93.8%, while specificity was 75.9%.
  • This pilot study involved 1,158 participants with valid FIT results, emphasizing diagnostic performance.
  • Using FIT can prevent unnecessary colonoscopies and facilitate earlier diagnoses of colorectal cancer.

Abstract

Background The New Zealand (NZ) FIT for Symptomatic Pilot (FSP) aimed to determine the feasibility of using faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as a triaging tool to assess patients presenting with symptoms suspicious for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods This is a double-blinded diagnostic accuracy study conducted in two Health NZ Districts from July 2022 to January 2024. Consecutive adult patients referred with symptoms of suspected CRC, who were triaged for colonoscopy by endoscopists, were invited to perform a quantitative FIT. The diagnostic performance of FIT for CRC was assessed. Results Valid FIT results were returned by 1,158 (82%) of 1,413 eligible patients; 1,043 were included in the diagnostic accuracy analysis. At low (“rule-out”) faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) thresholds, the sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 93.8% (CI 79.2–99.2) and 75.9% (CI 73.1–78.5) for f-Hb ≥4 μg/g and 90.6% (CI 75.0–98.0) and 83.1% (CI 80.6–85.4) for f-Hb ≥10 μg/g. At a higher (“rule-in”) f-Hb threshold of ≥150 μg/g, the sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 78.1% (CI 60.0–90.7) and 95.9% (CI 94.4–97.0). The prevalence of CRC was 3.1%. At the lower limit of f-Hb detection, 73.7% of symptomatic patients had a negative FIT. Conclusion FSP demonstrated that FIT identified both a small group of symptomatic patients with a high risk of undiagnosed CRC for urgent investigation and the majority of symptomatic patients with a very low f-Hb who could avoid colonoscopy. Using FIT in this setting should protect patients from unnecessary colonoscopy, diagnose CRC earlier, and optimise colonoscopy utilisation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saw et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4726431b076d99fa6b8dahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2025.1622258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) based prioritisation of new patient symptomatic cases referred for colorectal investigation2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Value-Based Algorithm to Triage Symptomatic Colorectal Patients: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital2024
  3. 3Diagnostic Accuracy of the Faecal Immunochemical Test in Triage of Symptomatic Patients Referred for Colonoscopy: A Prospective Single‐Centre Study2025
  4. 4Does the Value of the Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Result Matter, and Can This Be Used as a Triage Criterion for Symptomatic FIT-Positive Patients?2025
  5. 5FP3.3 - Sensitivity of Faecal Immunochemical Testing2024