PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Emergency Care and Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Coronary CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Clinical Utility

View Full Paper
KIKyvan IrannejadLHLogan HubbardANAditya Narashim

Key Points

  • CCTA significantly reduced diagnostic time by up to 54%, enhancing efficiency in the emergency department.
  • With a pooled sensitivity of over 90% and negative predictive value approaching 100%, CCTA reliably rules out coronary artery disease.
  • Economic evaluations demonstrated cost reductions due to shorter emergency department stays and decreased testing needs.
  • Challenges of CCTA include radiation exposure and potential incidental findings, necessitating further evaluation of its integration.

Abstract

Introduction: Chest pain is one of the most common and high-risk presentations in the emergency department (ED), necessitating timely and accurate evaluation to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality with high sensitivity (90–100%) and a negative predictive value (98–100%) for ruling out significant coronary artery disease (CAD), as evidenced by trials such as ROMICAT II and ACRIN-PA. Despite its expanding role in ED triage, further evaluation of its impact on patient-centered outcomes is essential. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between January 2010 and June 2025 were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies assessing CCTA in ED patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), compared with alternative diagnostic strategies, and reporting outcomes, including diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, ED discharge rates, hospital admissions, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Twenty-three studies comprising over 60,000 patients were included. CCTA in low- to intermediate-risk patients significantly reduced diagnostic time (up to 54%), increased early ED discharges, and lowered unnecessary admissions. It consistently demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with pooled sensitivity ≥90% and near-perfect negative predictive value. Economic evaluations showed reduced costs due to shorter ED stays and less downstream testing. Challenges included radiation exposure, contrast use, and incidental findings. Conclusions: CCTA enhances ED efficiency and safety in ACS evaluation, offering accurate CAD exclusion and resource optimization. Future studies should explore its long-term cost-effectiveness and integration into high-sensitivity troponin protocols.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Irannejad et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473a631b076d99fa6bdffhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ecm2030046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Exclude Acute Coronary Syndrome in Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients2025
  2. 2Clinical Benefits of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Low-Risk Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department ― Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ―2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Coronary CT Angiography versus Standard Evaluation in Acute Chest Pain2012 · 900 citations
  4. 4The role of cardiac computed tomography in the emergency department: diagnostic and prognostic insights2025
  5. 5The diagnostic utility of CT coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain2012 · 1 citations