PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Journal of Human Kinetics0 citationsOpen Access

Fact or Fiction? Examining the Veracity of Common Myths Related to 7-meter Throws in Handball

View Full Paper
ALAron LaxdalPBPer Thomas ByrkjedalAIAndréas Ivarsson

Key Points

  • The analysis indicated that taking a personal shot after a foul had no detrimental impact on scoring outcomes.
  • Data from 10,593 7-meter shots were examined using Bayesian three-level analysis to ensure robustness of results.
  • Changing shooters after a missed attempt does not affect the score rate, contrary to common coaching beliefs.
  • Understanding these findings may help coaches optimize their strategies without fear of negative consequences.

Abstract

There are several long-standing beliefs that persist in sport despite little or no evidence of them being true. The aim of this study was to assess the veracity of two such beliefs related to 7-meter (7-m) throws in handball: 1) that the fouled players should not take their own 7-m shots as their ability to score is compromised, and 2) that changing the 7-m shooter after a miss is more likely to lead to a goal than letting the player who missed try again. To assess the veracity of these beliefs 10,593 7-m shots from the Icelandic elite division were analyzed using a Bayesian three-level analysis. The results revealed that neither taking your own 7-m shot after being fouled nor taking a 7-m shot after missing the attempt appeared to have a negative effect on the outcome of 7-m shots. Coaches should therefore be able to let their most proficient 7-m shooters take any 7-m shot, regardless of preceding events, without any functional cost.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laxdal et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4759931b076d99fa6d7fehttps://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/204312
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper