PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Education Sciences6 citationsOpen Access

Using a Multi-Agent System and Evidence-Centered Design to Integrate Educator Expertise Within Generated Feedback

View Full Paper
EBErin BarnoGPGeoffrey Phelps

Key Points

  • The proposed design framework utilizes evidence-centered design to capture the complexities of mathematics teaching, enhancing feedback quality.
  • By creating design templates based on educator expertise, this approach translates insights into prompts for generative AI.
  • The multi-agent system employed allows for simulations of teacher rehearsals, effectively maintaining expertise complexity in feedback.
  • Implementing this framework could serve as a model for future simulations aimed at improving teacher learning and skill refinement.

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) can support mathematics teacher learning by automating parts of teacher rehearsals, or opportunities for teachers to practice specific mathematics teaching skills, receive feedback, and refine their approaches. However, little is known about how to design GenAI solutions that incorporate the expertise of mathematics teacher educators into the design of GenAI solutions. This article proposes a three-part design framework: first, by building on the modeling logic from evidence-centered design (ECD) to develop design templates that capture the complexity of mathematics teaching; second, by translating the expertise from these templates into prompts for GenAI; and third, by sharing how a multi-agent system that uses GenAI to simulate teacher rehearsals and feedback can keep the complexity of that expertise by splitting it across agents. We explore how this framework could serve as a general approach for designing simulations—both in its theoretical foundation and technical implementation—that support complex, interactive rehearsals intended to enhance teacher learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barno et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4759931b076d99fa6db41https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Implications of Evidence‐Centered Design for Educational Testing2006 · 540 citations
  2. 2Professional Noticing of Children's Mathematical Thinking2010 · 1,419 citations
  3. 3Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive.2024 · 167 citations
  4. 4A Brief Introduction to Evidence-Centered Design2004 · 164 citations
  5. 5Approximating the Practice of Mathematics Teaching: What Learning Can Web-based, Multimedia Storyboarding Software Enable?2014 · 31 citations