PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 2025Algorithms8 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the Promethee ii Ranking Quality

View Full Paper
BCBoris CoqueletGDGilles DejaegereYSYves De Smet

Key Points

  • This evaluation identifies a new indicator that assesses ranking quality from Promethee II results.
  • The new indicator is derived from a unique property of the net flow score procedure used in multicriteria decision aid.
  • Both artificial and real datasets were used to illustrate the effectiveness of the new quality indicator.
  • The findings suggest that the quality of rankings produced by Promethee II can be significantly evaluated against the preference matrix.

Abstract

Multicriteria decision aid consists in helping decision makers to compare (rank, choose, sort, etc.) different alternatives which are evaluated on conflicting criteria. One well-known family of multicriteria decision aid methods is Promethee. It is based on pairwise comparisons of the alternatives to produce a complete or a partial ranking. Promethee is widely used in practical applications, and different aspects of its theoretical properties have already been studied in the literature. However, no work has been proposed to assess the quality of the rankings it produces with regard to the pairwise preference matrix it exploits. This work addresses this problem by proposing a new indicator of the quality of the rankings produced by Promethee ii. This indicator is derived from a new property of the net flow score procedure. The indicator is illustrated on both artificial and real datasets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coquelet et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6c68eb1249cec298b2ea5https://doi.org/10.3390/a18100597
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper