PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 2025Theoretical and Applied Linguistics0 citations

The adversative conjunctions a 'but', no 'but', da 'but' in the Russian dialects of the Amur Region (Communicative and pragmatic aspects)

View Full Paper
VZVictor N. ZavyalovXZXe Ze

Key Points

  • Conjunctions a, no, and da primarily convey normal or abnormal consequences in speech, influencing meaning.
  • The study revealed these conjunctions facilitate explanation and clarification in normal scenarios, enhancing communication.
  • Descriptive design combined with quantitative and comparative methods was utilized to analyze local Russian accents.
  • Findings contribute to a broader understanding of the linguistic landscape among local accent speakers and Russian speakers.

Abstract

The article examines utterances with the coordinating conjunctions a 'but', no 'but', da (=no) 'but' that express contrast. The aim was to identify communicative and pragmatic meanings in whose expression these conjunctions participate along with other linguistic means. The research was conducted on the material of the Russian local accents of the Amur Region. The choice of local accents was determined by the modern tendency in science to describe regional varieties on the anthropological basis. Descriptive design was used together with quantitative and comparative methods, semantic and communicativepragmatic analyses to collect and process the material. It was found that the role of conjunctions a, no, da in dialect speakers is primarily limited to messages about a “normal” or “abnormal” consequence between composed propositions. In utterances expressing normal consequence, these conjunctions (except for da) are used by the speaker, as a rule, for explanationidentity, explanationclarification and explanationdescription. Utterances expressing abnormal consequence report (both directly and indirectly) about certain circumstances of an objective or subjective nature that arbitrarily affect a particular state of affairs. The results of this study not only enlarge the information about the features of the coordinating conjunctions a, no, da expressing contrast but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the linguistic picture of the world of local accents speakers as well as native Russian speakers as a whole.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zavyalov et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6cd6bb1249cec298b3cd9https://doi.org/10.22250/24107190-2024-10-2-27
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Specific features of Russian coordinating conjunctions from the activity approach perspective2024
  2. 2The conjunction "And" in the Russian dialects of the Amur region (constructive and communicative-pragmatic properties)2026
  3. 3Conjunction ili 'or' in the Russian dialects of the Amur Region2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Discursive words in the focus of regional linguistics (based on the material of Russian colloquial speech in Buryatia)2026
  5. 5Russian discourse word net ‘no’ in a contrastive perspective2024