PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Clinical & Translational Oncology11 citationsOpen Access

SEOM-GEICO clinical guidelines on endometrial cancer (2025)

View Full Paper
SRSusana RamirezAFAlejandro Pérez FidalgoMGM.P. Barretina Ginesta

Key Points

  • Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy, and prognosis remains poor after relapse.
  • Molecular characterization helps accurately stratify risk and may change treatment approaches in patients.
  • Total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are standard for early-stage endometrial cancer.
  • Recent advances in immunotherapy offer new therapeutic options for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. Although most cases are diagnosed at an early stage, prognosis in case of relapse or metastasis remains poor. Molecular characterization of EC is highly recommended as it allows more accurate risk stratification and may modify treatment recommendations. The updated FIGO 2023 staging of EC highlights the importance of traditional clinicopathological factors, while underlining the need for molecular classification to predict outcomes. In early-stage EC, standard treatment consists of total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymph node evaluation remains controversial, as the benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy are unclear. Adjuvant treatment, consisting of radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy, should be chosen according to risk category. In women with advanced or recurrent EC, the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel has long been standard treatment. However, therapeutic options have changed recently due to advances in immunotherapy. The aim of this guideline is to summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of EC, and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramirez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8548b2b6861e4c3e547https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-04046-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy followed by dostarlimab plus niraparib maintenance therapy among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY trial2024 · 24 citations
  2. 2Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz–Jeghers syndrome2000 · 1,448 citations
  3. 3Is hormonal therapy effective in advanced endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis2017 · 112 citations
  4. 4ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer2024 · 92 citations
  5. 5Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy2020 · 864 citations