PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Organizational Form, Tariff Protection and Free Trade in Port Competition

View Full Paper
KCKangsik Choi

Key Points

  • Choosing M-form under tariff protection boosts social welfare, consumer surplus, and firm's profit compared to free trade.
  • U-form emerges as an equilibrium in public port ownership under free trade, indicating a shift in organizational preference based on trade policies.
  • Public port ownership influences firms' strategic choices, highlighting the importance of institutional structures in competitive environments.
  • Results challenge traditional views, as tariff regimes can outperform free trade in enhancing overall welfare in port competition.

Abstract

Abstract Incorporating public port ownership structures and port usage fees into the reciprocal trade model, we analyze the endogenous firms' choice of organization form facing trade policies. When ports are in public ownership under free trade, U-form emerges as an equilibrium even though choosing M-form for governments is socially desirable. These results are reversed (i.e., M-form is an equilibrium) in public port ownership under the tariff regime when choosing the organization form. However, choosing M-form under the tariff regime is Pareto efficiency for firms and social welfare. Contrast to previous results, in the case of Cournot competition, social welfare, consumer surplus and firm's profit under the tariff regime are greater than those under free trade.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kangsik Choi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8978b2b6861e4c3ed0fhttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6181569/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper