PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citationsOpen Access

On cusps in the η' potential

View Full Paper
RKRyuichiro KitanoRMRyutaro MatsudoLTLukas Treuer

Key Points

  • The η' potential exhibits cusps at specific values related to the number of flavors, indicating critical points.
  • Finite N scenarios show potential cusps when N and Nf are not coprime, demonstrating non-smooth connections.
  • The analysis for Nf = N supports the cusp argument due to anomaly considerations, contrasting with smooth cases.
  • S-confinement in QCD-like theories requires coprimality of N and Nf, impacting the behavior of η' mesons.

Abstract

The large N analysis of QCD states that the potential for the η' meson develops cusps at η' = π/ Nf, 3 π/Nf, , with Nf the number of flavors. Furthermore, the recent discussion of generalized anomalies tells us that even for finite N there should be cusps if N and Nf are not coprime, as one can show that the domain wall configuration of η' should support a Chern-Simons theory on it, i. e. , domains are not smoothly connected. On the other hand, there is a supporting argument for instanton-like, smooth potentials of η' from the analyses of softly-broken supersymmetric QCD for Nf= N-1, N, and N+1. We argue that the analysis of the Nf = N case should be subject to the above anomaly argument, and thus there should be a cusp; while the Nf = N 1 cases are consistent, as Nf and N are coprime. We discuss how this cuspy/smooth transition can be understood. For Nf< N, we find that the number of branches of the η' potential is gcd (N, Nf), which is the minimum number allowed by the anomaly. We also discuss the condition for s-confinement in QCD-like theories, and find that in general the anomaly matching of the θ periodicity indicates that s-confinement can only be possible when Nf and N are coprime. The s-confinement in supersymmetric QCD at Nf = N+1 is a famous example, and the argument generalizes for any number of fermions in the adjoint representation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kitano et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e0fc8b2b6861e4c3f2d4https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.20372
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper