PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Mathematics of Operations Research0 citations

Nash Equilibria for Dividend Distribution with Competition

View Full Paper
TATiziano De AngelisFGFabien GensbittelSVStéphane Villeneuve

Key Points

  • Nash equilibria are established in a dynamic game involving two firms, focusing on their dividend distribution strategies.
  • The optimal strategies and equilibrium payoffs are derived based on firms' initial endowments and competition dynamics.
  • The analysis focuses on absorption and default risk, showing how defaulting affects monopolistic gain for the surviving firm.
  • Findings suggest that strategic interactions in dividend policies are crucial for firms operating under financial constraints.

Abstract

We construct Nash equilibria in feedback form for a class of two-person stochastic games of singular control with absorption, arising from a stylized model for corporate finance. More precisely, the paper focuses on a strategic dynamic game in which two financially constrained firms operate in the same market. The firms distribute dividends and are faced with default risk. The strategic interaction arises from the fact that if one firm defaults, the other one becomes a monopolist and increases its profitability. The firms choose their dividend distribution policies from a class of randomized strategies, and we identify two types of equilibria, depending on the firms’ initial endowments. In both situations, the optimal strategies and the equilibrium payoffs are found explicitly. Funding: T. De Angelis was partially supported by PRIN2022 project ID BEMMLZ Stochastic Control and Games and the Role of Information. Part of the research was conducted while S. Villeneuve was visiting Collegio Carlo Alberto in Torino, under a fellowship granted by LTI@UniTO. F. Gensbittel received financial support from ANR Programmes d’Investissements d’Avenir CHESS ANR-17-EURE-0010 and ANITI ANR-19-PI3A-0004.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Angelis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e1248b2b6861e4c3f6aahttps://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper