PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citations

Developing and piloting an intervention to increase adolescent access to sexual and reproductive healthcare: a mixed-methods study.

View Full Paper
MMMelissa K. MillerRBRomina BarralJNJanelle Noel‐MacDonnell

Key Points

  • A multi-component intervention increased trust and satisfaction among adolescents seeking sexual and reproductive health services.
  • 76% of participants reported high satisfaction with outreach events, showing the potential effectiveness of community-based strategies.
  • Initial trust levels were moderate; however, improvements were noted at follow-up with increased SRH service utilization.
  • Community-driven development of the intervention was essential in addressing the unique needs of marginalized youth populations.

Abstract

This mixed-methods study describes the development and pilot testing of AccessKCTeen, an intervention to improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) access for marginalized youth. Community discussions guided development of an intervention featuring SRH outreach events to disseminate information, share resources, and connect teens to care via telemedicine and mobile health clinics. During eight outreach events, we recruited adolescent participants for baseline assessments (demographics, event satisfaction, and trust in the medical profession) and one-month follow-up (trust and SRH utilization). We documented feedback on SRH resources (e.g. condoms), telemedicine, and mobile care with field notes. Among 96 participants (46% Black; 23% Hispanic; 23% gender minority; 50% sexual minority), most were 'very' (76%) or 'somewhat' (9%) satisfied with the event; 15% were 'neutral'. At baseline, trust was moderate (16.4 ± 2.7; scale range 5-25). Many accepted SRH items for future use. Field notes documented adolescent comments regarding telemedicine as safe, private, and convenient, and the mobile clinic as private and trustworthy. At follow-up, 20% obtained healthcare; trust was 17.2 ± 2.8. Our findings indicate that a community-integrated, multi-component intervention is acceptable to adolescents and warrants further evaluation of its impact on SRH outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e14f8b2b6861e4c3fbd3https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Pilot Study of Integrated Digital Tools at a School-Based Health Center Using the RE-AIM Framework2025
  2. 2Increasing young people’s use of sexual and reproductive health services in government health facilities in rural Kenya2026
  3. 3Implementing routine sexual and reproductive health screening into an Australian child and youth mental health service: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial2025
  4. 4Effectiveness of a parent-based intervention to improve adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health knowledge: a pilot study2026
  5. 5The impact of an innovative community-based peer-led intervention on uptake and coverage of sexual and reproductive health services among adolescents and young people 15–24 years old: results from the Yathu Yathu cluster randomised trial2024 · 3 citations