PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citations

Accuracy of machine learning-assisted prediction of the future need for orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate.

View Full Paper
SLSeung-Weon LimEKE.-G. KimHKHong‐Gee Kim

Key Points

  • Machine learning achieved an accuracy of 83.7% in predicting orthognathic surgery need in patients with cleft lip and palate.
  • A total of 25.3% of the 245 studied patients were classified as needing surgery based on specific cephalometric criteria.
  • Cephalometric variables were analyzed using support vector machine and feature importance analysis to evaluate prediction accuracy.
  • Findings suggest machine learning can enhance decision-making in identifying candidates for orthognathic surgery at a young age.

Abstract

To investigate the accuracy of machine learning (ML)-assisted prediction of the need for orthognathic surgery (OGS) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). This study included 245 patients with CLP whose lateral cephalograms were available at pre-adolescence (T0; mean age, 8.45 years) and young adulthood (T1; mean age: 18.37 years). At T1, the patients were classified into the surgery group based on two criteria: (1) satisfying at least three of the following four conditions: ANB 90°, and AB-MP < 60° and (2) undergoing presurgical orthodontic treatment or having undergone OGS. A total of 25.3% (n = 62) of patients were assigned to the surgery group, while 74.7% (n = 183) were assigned to the non-surgery group. Further, 80% and 20% of each group were used as training/validation and test sets, respectively. After 37 cephalometric variables and two cleft-related variables were measured, support vector machine (SVM) and feature importance analysis (FIA) with Shapley additive explanation were used to determine the prediction accuracy and predictors at T0. SVM demonstrated area under curve 0.84, accuracy 83.7%, sensitivity 83.3%, and specificity 83.8%. FIA revealed 10 predictors: A to N-perpendicular, L1 to A-Pog, Pog to N-perpendicular, L1 to Lower-occlusal plane, Cleft type, U1 to Upper-occlusal plane, IMPA, gonial angle, anteroposterior facial height ratio, and ANB with accumulated importance of 64.51%. The ML algorithm used in this study may support clinical decision-making in identifying candidates for future OGS at 8 years of age.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e14f8b2b6861e4c3fc3chttps://doi.org/10.4041/kjod25.030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper