PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Theoretical and Applied Linguistics0 citations

Adverb production by affixation in the Ulch language (Comparing Nanai and Orok)

View Full Paper
VGViktoriya A. Gorbunova

Key Points

  • Patterns of adverb production in the Ulch language highlight the unique grammatical structures present.
  • Around 200 pairs of ‘producing stem + derivate’ were analyzed, revealing twenty distinct adverb formation patterns.
  • Certain suffixes operate across different parts of speech, demonstrating flexibility in the Ulch grammatical system.
  • The study uncovers mixed methods of formation, combining affixation with other techniques like reduplication.

Abstract

The paper examines the patterns of adverb formation by affixation in the Ulch language. The aim is to identify the range of grammatical types of stems and suffixes used in the patterns as well as the change in meaning triggered by the derivation process for each pattern. The tokens for analysis were selected by continuous sampling from Ulch dictionaries and glossaries found in published studies on the Ulch language. The total of about 200 ‘producing stem + derivate’ pairs were selected and further processed using component, comparative and qualitative analysis. As a result, about twenty patterns were discovered including verbtoadverb, adjectivetoadverb, nountoadverb, adverbbased and numeraltoadverb patterns. Some of the patterns were found to operate identical suffixes that display an ability to combine with stems belonging to various parts of speech. This turns out a distinguishing feature of the Ulch grammatical system we previously documented for noun and adjective production. The characteristic feature of the adverb production is the lack of a strict border between affix and nonaffix patterns making itself evident by such phenomena as (i) the use of derivational suffixes possibly originating from inflectional affixes figuring in the forms that underwent conversion, (ii) the use of mixed methods (reduplication combined with affixation).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Viktoriya A. Gorbunova (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6eec28b2b6861e4c4229dhttps://doi.org/10.22250/24107190-2024-10-2-15
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Verbal affixes in the Muna Language based on morphological and semantic analysis2025
  2. 2SUFFIXAL DERIVATION IN ADJECTIVAL UNITS OF LINGUISTIC TERMINOLOGY: STRUCTURAL, SEMANTIC AND TYPOLOGICAL EXPANSION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK2026
  3. 3ON THE HISTORICAL FORMATION OF THE PARADIGM OF ADJECTIVES AND ADJECTIVE-DERIVING AFFIXAL MORPHEMS2025
  4. 4The Role of Affixation in the Formation of Meaning on Two-word bases in Sundanese2025
  5. 5The Productivity of Affixes of Words Derived from Bases in Hawrami Dialect2020