PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025PLoS ONE4 citationsOpen Access

Effects of digital health counseling and behavioral interventions on weight management during pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
SKSahar KhademiooreImpactAPAlexandra M. PalumboImpactASAhmad Sofi‐MahmudiMcMaster University Medical Centre

Key Points

  • Digital health interventions reduced gestational weight gain by 0.78 kg compared to routine care.
  • The risk of excessive gestational weight gain decreased significantly, with a relative risk of 0.80.
  • Low-certainty evidence indicated potential reductions in gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia risks.
  • High-certainty evidence showed minimal effect on birth weight from digital health interventions.

Abstract

Objectives This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of digital health counseling or behavioral weight management interventions for preventing excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) among pregnant individuals of all body mass index (BMI) categories, compared to routine care. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations/Theses, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to February 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) wherein pregnant women received counseling or behavioral interventions through digital health compared to routine care. Pairs of reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and extracted data from eligible RCTs. Data were pooled using inverse-variance random-effects meta-analyses. We applied the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the magnitude and certainty of the effects. Results We included 18 trials. Moderate certainty evidence showed 0.78 kg lower GWG in the weight management digital health intervention group, compared with routine care (95% CI: −1.40 to −0.16 kg). This reduction was higher in individuals with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . Digital health interventions likely reduce the risk of excessive GWG (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.95) and may result in little to no difference in the rate of cesarean birth (CB) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.48). Low-certainty evidence suggested that digital health weight management interventions may reduce the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.12), pre-eclampsia (RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.33), and preterm birth (RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28). High-certainty evidence showed that digital health weight management interventions have little to no effect on birthweight (MD = 0.00; 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.08). Conclusions Digital health interventions are effective in reducing GWG and excessive GWG based on BMI. Additionally, evidence suggests that these interventions may lower the risk of GDM, pre-eclampsia, and preterm birth. However, their impact on birthweight, GWG across all BMI categories, and the risk of CB is trivial.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khademioore et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7b3d4eebfec0fc523655fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper