PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Journal of Craniofacial Surgery2 citations

Reasons for Removal of Mandibular Reconstruction Plates

View Full Paper
BHBenedicta S. HainguraRRRisimati Ephraim Rikhotso

Key Points

  • Plate fracture was observed in 9 patients, with a significantly higher plate length in those experiencing complications.
  • Dehiscence and infection were noted in 38 and 21 cases respectively, highlighting significant complications associated with MRPs.
  • Analysis revealed that smoking was significantly associated with infection, indicating lifestyle factors play a role in complications.
  • The study involved 100 patients over five years, assessing parameters like defect type and soft tissue adequacy for predicting complications.

Abstract

Background: Mandibular reconstruction plates (MRPs), used alone or alongside bone reconstruction, are now the standard approach for treating mandibular continuity defects. Advancements in plate design and materials have improved the success rate of mandibular reconstruction. Nonetheless, plate-related complications remain prevalent and may, in some cases, result in significant morbidity for patients. Objective: To determine complications associated with MRPs and analyse parameters related to the complications. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was undertaken over a 5-year period (from January 2018 to December 2022) on patients who had complications after segmental resection and reconstruction with MRPs. Complications were analysed according to age, sex, location of defect, defect size, and whether the patient underwent a bone graft procedure or not. Univariate binary logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of complications. The level of significance was set at P ≤0.05. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Benign and malignant tumors accounted for 76 and 18 cases, respectively. The prebent technique was used in 96 patients. LCL (63%), LC (18%), and HCL (14%) were the most observed defects. Dehiscence (n = 38), infection (n = 21), and plate fracture (n = 9) were the most common complications. Smoking ( P = 0.005) and smoking and alcohol ( P = 0.008) were significantly associated with the presence of infection. Six of the 9 patients with plate fracture had no bone graft. Plate length was significantly higher in participants with plate failure ( P = 0.032). Conclusions: Risk stratification for plate-related complications should consider factors such as plate length, defect type, soft tissue adequacy, and smoking and tobacco use. Patients with anterolateral defects and longer reconstruction plates are at higher risk for complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haingura et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7b3e2eebfec0fc52369a7https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011994
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reconstruction plates used in the surgery for mandibular discontinuity defect2014 · 59 citations
  2. 2Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up2009 · 165 citations
  3. 3Mandibular reconstruction using AO plates1987 · 91 citations
  4. 4Mandible reconstruction2014 · 69 citations
  5. 5Orofacial and Mandibular Reconstruction with the Iliac Crest Free Flap1989 · 426 citations