PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Buildings5 citationsOpen Access

Managing Psychosocial Health Risks in the Australian Construction Industry: A Holistic Hazard Management Intervention

View Full Paper
ABAmanda BiggsAKAshlea KellnerARA.P. Robertson

Key Points

  • Job demands and resources significantly improved after the intervention, leading to better mental health outcomes.
  • Workers reported lower levels of psychological distress compared to those in similar construction environments without the intervention.
  • The holistic approach addresses multiple levels within the organization to manage psychosocial risks effectively.
  • Findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted interventions in high-risk occupations like construction to mitigate mental health harms.

Abstract

This study presents a case study of a holistic, psychosocial hazard management intervention program in a project-based, remote workforce in the Australian construction industry. There is a dearth of research on targeted, integrative, multi-level wellbeing interventions, and we seek to address this gap. Given the high rates of psychological distress and suicide in construction, understanding these hazards and the responses needed to manage them is critical for prevention. Data were collected from workers before and after the implementation of an intervention using an empirically validated measure of the work environment underpinned by the job demands–resources framework to evaluate exposure to psychosocial hazards, and mental health indicators, including psychological distress and suicidal ideation. Results revealed that job demands and resources improved following the change initiative, and workers reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress compared to workers on similarly diverse remote sites. The findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions addressing specific workplace psychosocial risks that adopt a holistic approach to change across all levels of an organisation. The study contributes to a nuanced understanding of psychosocial risks in construction and informs strategies to mitigate mental health harms in high-risk occupational settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biggs et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7be70eebfec0fc52383c5https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193475
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R):Validation with Clinical and Nonclinical Samples2001 · 2,292 citations
  2. 2The use of the General Health Questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies1980 · 695 citations
  3. 3The neuroimmune response during stress: A physiological perspective2021 · 120 citations
  4. 4Construction workers' alcohol use, knowledge, perceptions of risk and workplace norms2020 · 51 citations
  5. 5Is job strain associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies2021 · 34 citations