PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 20257 citations

Use of statins and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events with tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

View Full Paper
JGJon T. GilesCCChristina Charles‐SchoemanMBMaya H Buch

Key Points

  • Use of statins may mitigate cardiovascular risks associated with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • Among RA patients with a history of ASCVD, 53% used statins at baseline, suggesting widespread need for cardiovascular prevention.
  • Tofacitinib-treated patients showed greater increases in low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein compared to TNF inhibitors.
  • The findings highlight a significant gap in cardiovascular preventive care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Abstract

This study aims to assess statin usage and its association with incident major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib vs tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in ORAL Surveillance. Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg (N = 1455) or 10 mg twice a day (N = 1456) or TNFi (N = 1451). Statin treatment was assessed at baseline and during the study. Hazard ratios (HR) were evaluated for MACE in participants with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and in categories of predicted CV risk. Among participants with a history of ASCVD or high CV risk, 53.0% and 26.9%, respectively, used a statin at baseline. Baseline statin use was similar in tofacitinib and TNFi-treated participants. In participants with or without statins, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein increased from baseline and to a larger extent with tofacitinib than with TNFi. Occurrence of MACE in participants with a history of ASCVD and no use of statins at any time was higher with tofacitinib vs TNFi (HR 4.07 95% CI 1.20-13.82). In participants with a history of ASCVD and use of statins at baseline or at any time, there was no difference in incident MACE with tofacitinib vs TNFi (HR 1.17 95% CI 0.46-3.00). This post hoc analysis of ORAL Surveillance emphasises the gap in the CV preventive care of patients with RA. Among patients with a history of ASCVD, use of statins may mitigate the previously reported MACE risk observed to accompany tofacitinib use vs TNFi. This trial was registered with NCT number NCT02092467.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giles et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc66eebfec0fc5238945https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.08.028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Risk of dyslipidemia and major adverse cardiac events with tofacitinib versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world cohort study from 7580 patients2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Risk of serious infections, myocardial infarction or stroke, venous thromboembolic events, and malignancy in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib compared with biologic treatments in the United States2026
  4. 4Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Malignancies, and Serious Infections With Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of a 3‐Year J‐Post‐Marketing Surveillance2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Cardiovascular Events, Malignancies, and Efficacy Outcomes in Latin American Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib or Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors2024 · 1 citations