PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 20250 citations

Save or Remove the Accessory Spleen in Patient Candidates to Splenectomy for Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Rational and Literature Review.

View Full Paper
VRValerio RinaldiMRMichela RibersaniCGCarla Giordano

Key Points

  • Sparing a healthy accessory spleen during splenectomy may help maintain immune competence for patients with lymphoproliferative disorders.
  • Histopathological findings confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the spleen while the accessory spleen remained uninvolved after surgery.
  • A 59-year-old woman's case highlights the need for further research on the decision to remove or spare accessory spleens during diagnostic splenectomy.
  • Insufficient evidence currently exists to guide the surgical approach for accessory spleen management in lymphoproliferative disorder cases.

Abstract

Sparing or removing the accessory spleen (AS) in patients undergoing diagnostic splenectomy for lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) is an unsolved issue rarely considered. Usually, a healthy AS can be preserved. Reporting a case of our own, this paper aims to review existing literature and propose a tailored approach. A 59-year-old woman presented with unexplained anemia. A FDG-PET-CT scan revealed splenomegaly and two hypermetabolic splenic nodules, pathological upper and lower diaphragmatic lymph nodes, and a non-FDG-avid AS around splenic hilum. The patient underwent diagnostic splenectomy and AS removal. The histopathological examination of the spleen disclosed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), whereas the AS was uninvolved, consistent with the preoperative FDG-PET-CT findings. The post-operative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on the 5th post-operative day. Asplenia following splenectomy increases the risk of severe infections. It is hypothesized that sparing a healthy AS could help maintain immune competence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to guide the decision on whether to remove or spare an AS during splenectomy for diagnostic purposes in suspected LPD cases, and to understand the potential prognostic impact (both oncological and infectious) of this strategy. The preoperative finding of a non-FDG-avid AS may recommend surgical sparing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rinaldi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc66eebfec0fc5238a0ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.70735
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Laparoscopic excision of accessory spleen for recurrent autoimmune hemolytic anemia after splenectomy: a case report2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy May Be Valuable for the Diagnosis of Malignant Lymphoma: A Case Report2024
  3. 3Evaluating the Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Removal of an Accessory Spleen After a Failed Splenectomy for Immune Thrombocytopenia2024
  4. 4C45-14 Thoracic Splenosis Mimicking Infectious and Neoplastic Disease in a Postsplenectomy Patient: A Diagnostic Challenge2026
  5. 5Laparoscopic Subtotal Splenectomy in Pediatric Patients With Hematologic Disorders: A Case Series and Operative Technique.2025