PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025ACS Energy Letters10 citations

Beyond Conventional Methods for Evaluating Charge Transfer Kinetics in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries: Insights from Ultramicroelectrode Voltammetry and Marcus–Hush Theory

View Full Paper
ZWZiqing WangKKKenta KawashimaCMC. Buddie Mullins

Key Points

  • Charge transfer kinetics are critical for optimizing aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs), impacting their overall efficiency.
  • The study accurately measures exchange current density and reorganization energy using ultramicroelectrodes in various zinc electrolytes.
  • While the Butler–Volmer model is effective at low overpotentials, it does not adequately describe behavior at higher overpotentials.
  • The findings indicate that larger anions and higher viscosity electrolytes affect charge transfer parameters in zinc-ion batteries.

Abstract

Understanding intrinsic charge transfer kinetics is essential for aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs). In this work, we employ fast-scan cyclic voltammetry with ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) to eliminate mass transfer limitations and accurately extract the exchange current density (j0) and reorganization energy (λ) in representative zinc electrolytes: Zn(ClO4)2, ZnSO4, Zn(TfO)2, and ZnCl2. While the Butler–Volmer model accurately describes kinetics at low overpotentials, it fails to capture the nonlinear Tafel behavior at higher overpotentials. In contrast, the Marcus–Hush model successfully accounts for these deviations while also providing physically meaningful kinetic parameters across a wider potential range. Additionally, electrolytes with larger anions and higher viscosities exhibit lower values for j0 and higher values for λ, indicating that solvation structure and ion–solvent interactions contribute to interfacial kinetics. These findings highlight the limitations of the Butler–Volmer model and demonstrate that Marcus–Hush theory offers a more rigorous and accurate approach for evaluating charge transfer in AZIBs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d909fc41e1c178a14f5cabhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c02639
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Anion‐Regulated Electric Double Layer and Progressive Nucleation Enable Uniform and Nanoscale Zn Deposition for Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries2024 · 78 citations
  2. 2Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion2015 · 3,273 citations
  3. 3Manipulating the ion-transfer kinetics and interface stability for high-performance zinc metal anodes2019 · 1,302 citations
  4. 4Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry as a method to measure rapid heterogeneous electron-transfer kinetics1988 · 259 citations
  5. 5Gradient Desolvation–Diffusion Kinetic Layer Promoters for Low-Temperature Dendrite-Free Zn Metal Batteries2025 · 21 citations