PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 20254 citations

Rethinking MRI Protocols for Pituitary Microadenomas: Prioritizing Non-Contrast Imaging for Safe Follow-Up.

View Full Paper
FZFariba ZareiFNFarideh NematollahiAJAbdemouhed Jalil

Key Points

  • Non-contrast MRI achieved a detection rate of 70.9% for T2W sequences, indicating its effectiveness.
  • Tumor growth was stable with no significant change, ruling out the need for gadolinium in follow-up imaging.
  • DCE-MRI remained the most sensitive for initial diagnoses, but non-contrast imaging visualized most microadenomas.
  • Omitting gadolinium can lead to lower healthcare costs and reduced patient risk from potential adverse reactions.

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has been used as a gold standard in diagnosing and following pituitary microadenomas. However, the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) involves a potential risk of long-term retention in tissues and adverse reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of non-contrast MRI (T1W and T2W sequences) in follow-up imaging of pituitary microadenomas, attempting a comparison with DCE-MRI, assessing tumor stability over time. We retrospectively reviewed 300 pituitary MRI scans between 2020 and 2024. Included were patients with confirmed microadenomas (≤10 mm). Non-contrast (T1W/T2W) and DCE-MRI sequences were analyzed by an experienced radiologist blinded to any clinical information. Detection rates and changes in tumor size were evaluated. Detection rates for 79 microadenomas were 55.7% for T1W, 70.9% for T2W, and 88.6% for DCE-MRI. There was no significant tumor growth during the follow-up (mean size 4.80 ± 2.3 mm vs. 4.81 ± 2.4 mm, p > 0.5). While still more sensitive for the primary diagnosis, the non-contrast MRI was able to visualize the majority of detected microadenomas, and significant growth was ruled out, thus supporting the case to omit gadolinium from follow-up imaging in stable cases. This may translate to lower costs and decreased patient risk from contrast-related hazards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zarei et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90a0a41e1c178a14f67a0https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11090105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in the Follow-up of Pituitary Adenomas Following Transsphenoidal Surgery: Are Clinical Outcomes Affected?2026
  2. 2Contrast-free MRI Protocol for Pituitary Assessment in Children with Growth or Puberty Disorders: A Practical Approach.2021
  3. 3Endocrine inactive pituitary microadenomas: current data on natural history and follow-up approaches2026
  4. 4Decoding the sella: a review of MRI in pituitary lesions—from dynamic imaging to artificial intelligence2026
  5. 58263 Long-term Imaging Follow-up of Non-functioning Pituitary Adenomas2024