PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Reading & Writing Quarterly0 citationsOpen Access

A False Dichotomy: Contextual Factors and EFL Learners’ Syntax

View Full Paper
GKGhulam Abbas Khushik

Key Points

  • Significant cross-national differences in syntactic complexity were found between learners from Finland and Pakistan.
  • The study measured syntactic complexity using an automated natural language processing tool, highlighting trends in language production.
  • This research utilized a socio-materialistic framework, emphasizing the role of contextual factors alongside learner-related variables.
  • Findings inform teacher training and curriculum design, highlighting how contextual resources affect EFL writing development.

Abstract

This study employs a socio-materialistic theoretical framework to explore how the interaction of learner-related, institutional, and contextual factors shapes syntactic complexity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. The socio-materialistic perspective moves beyond traditional, language-focused models by recognizing the active role of materials, teaching practices, and environmental settings in the construction of language knowledge. A total of 444 eighth-grade EFL learners (aged 13–14) from Finland and Pakistan participated by composing argumentative essays in English. Syntactic complexity was extracted using an automated natural language processing (NLP) tool, which measured production unit length, sentence complexity, subordination, coordination, and selected structural indices. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to compare syntactic complexity across Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels A1, A2, and B1 between the two cohorts. The results revealed significant cross-national differences, indicating that first language influence, institutional teaching practices, and learning environments play a substantial role in shaping EFL writing development. The study contributes theoretically by applying a socio-materialistic lens to reveal how language learning emerges from dynamic interactions between human and non-human factors. Practically, the findings support the refinement of CEFR-based assessment criteria and inform teacher training, curriculum design, and language policy by emphasizing the importance of integrating contextual and material resources into pedagogy. This research advances understanding of how socio-material conditions influence syntactic development in foreign language acquisition and offers a foundation for more context-sensitive approaches to teaching and testing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghulam Abbas Khushik (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d913a34ddcf71ba560b897https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2025.2554653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Is the variation in syntactic complexity features observed in argumentative essays produced by B1 level EFL learners in Finland and Pakistan attributable exclusively to their L1?2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Examining Syntactic Complexity in EFL Learners’ IELTS Writing Performance2025
  3. 3Does Higher Grade Indicate More Complex Language Usage? Exploring Syntactic Complexity Development Among High School EFL Learners2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4The The correlations between the average semester growth rates of syntactic and lexical complexity in L2 writing development at secondary school2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5The dynamics of syntactic and lexical complexity measures in academic writing2024 · 4 citations