PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Scientific Reports5 citationsOpen Access

A nomogram and random forest model for predicting liver metastasis in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer

View Full Paper
XHXingzhi HanNanjing University of Chinese MedicineXBXueying BaiNanjing University of Chinese MedicineQZQun ZhangChaozhou Central Hospital

Key Points

  • The nomogram predicts liver metastasis risk in early-onset colorectal cancer patients with high accuracy.
  • Risk factors identified include N stage, pretreatment CEA, and presence of bone or lung metastasis.
  • Assessment involved univariate and multivariate logistic analysis, yielding AUCs of 0.7958 and 0.7653 for training and validation sets.
  • The model demonstrates better clinical relevance compared to traditional TN staging, aiding in risk assessment.

Abstract

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals under the age of 50 has increased. Liver metastasis (LM) is the most common metastasis in CRC patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to use public databases to identify the risk factors for LM in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) patients and develop a nomogram to quantify the risk of LM. We retrospectively collected data of EOCRC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were used to screen and validate the risk factors for LM in EOCRC patients, and a nomogram was established based on these factors. Calibration curve, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were developed to evaluate the accuracy of the model. A total of 2567 EOCRC patients were included and randomly divided into a training set (n = 1797) and a validation set (n = 770) at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that N stage, pretreatment CEA, bone metastasis, and lung metastasis were independent risk factors. The AUCs of the training set and validation set were 0.7958 and 0.7653, respectively, and the calibration curve also demonstrated good accuracy and predictive ability. DCA indicated that it was more clinically relevant than the traditional TN staging. We constructed a Random Forest model, and calculated the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to determine variables importance and visualize the results. We developed a nomogram to predict the risk of LM in EOCRC patients, and the model was internally validated with good accuracy and reliability. It can assist doctors in risk assessment and clinical decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d913b24ddcf71ba560c06ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18118-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries2021 · 114,179 citations
  2. 2Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype2014 · 505 citations
  3. 3Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by protein-tyrosine phosphatase type 4A, 3 (PRL-3) is mediated through lymph node metastasis and elevated serum tumor markers such as CEA and CA19-91994 · 33 citations
  4. 4The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.1999 · 585 citations
  5. 5Analysis of pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis of submucosal invasive colon cancer2004 · 140 citations