PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2025BMC Psychology7 citationsOpen Access

Screening for eating disorders in adolescents: psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination questionnaire short version (EDE-QS) in a community sample

View Full Paper
CDCamilla Lindvall DahlgrenLBLasse BangRBRafael Valdece Sousa Bastos

Key Points

  • The EDE-QS demonstrated strong structural validity and excellent internal consistency, supporting its use in clinical settings.
  • ROC analysis identified a cut-off score of 20, with sensitivity at 0.64 and specificity at 0.81, particularly for females.
  • Data were collected from 1,430 adolescents aged 16-19 in six upper secondary schools in Norway, emphasizing diverse samples.
  • Further validation is needed for the EDE-QS in male and gender-diverse adolescents, highlighting its current limitations.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short version (EDE-QS) in a community sample of adolescents and to establish an optimal clinical cut-off score for screening purposes. Clinical interview and self-report data were collected as part of a broader epidemiological study conducted across six upper secondary schools in Norway. The sample included 1,430 adolescents (744 females, 686 males) aged 16-19 years (M = 17.03, SD = 0.90). Data were collected between November 2020 and May 2021. Psychometric evaluation included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), assessment of convergent validity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal clinical cut-off score in females. The EDE-QS demonstrated good structural validity and excellent internal consistency. Findings also supported its convergent and criterion validity. The measure appears particularly suitable for epidemiological and clinical research contexts, where brief yet valid screening tools are essential. ROC analysis using the Youden criterion identified a cut-off score of 20 as providing the optimal balance of sensitivity (0.64) and specificity (0.81). This cut-off was derived from female participants only. The EDE-QS combines robust psychometric properties with brevity, making it especially appropriate for use in large-scale epidemiological and clinical studies, where minimizing participant burden is critical. A limitation of the current study is that the clinical cut-off was established based solely on diagnostic data from female participants. Further validation is needed to assess the utility of the EDE-QS as a screening tool in male and gender-diverse adolescents. Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dahlgren et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68da63b65b96be28fdab9ca5https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03400-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The impact of age and BMI on Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) scores in a community sample2012 · 126 citations
  2. 2Separating binge‐eating disorder stigma and weight stigma: A vignette study2021 · 25 citations
  3. 3The eating disorder examination: A semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders1987 · 1,383 citations
  4. 4An introduction to ROC analysis2005 · 21,905 citations
  5. 5Structural validity of the Eating Disorder Examination—Questionnaire: A systematic review2022 · 81 citations