PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Improvements on uncertainty quantification with variational autoencoders

View Full Paper
ATAndrea ToniniTBTan Bui–ThanhFRFrancesco Regazzoni

Key Points

  • The novel loss function increases the accuracy of uncertainty quantification variational autoencoders.
  • This approach reduces training time significantly in high dimensional parameter spaces.
  • Validation through three benchmark tests shows effective parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification.
  • The study introduces a new theoretical result regarding the approximation of posterior distributions.

Abstract

Inverse problems aim to determine model parameters of a mathematical problem from given observational data. Neural networks can provide an efficient tool to solve these problems. In the context of Bayesian inverse problems, Uncertainty Quantification Variational AutoEncoders (UQ-VAE), a class of neural networks, approximate the posterior distribution mean and covariance of model parameters. This allows for both the estimation of the parameters and their uncertainty in relation to the observational data. In this work, we propose a novel loss function for training UQ-VAEs, which includes, among other modifications, the removal of a sample mean term from an already existing one. This modification improves the accuracy of UQ-VAEs, as the original theoretical result relies on the convergence of the sample mean to the expected value (a condition that, in high dimensional parameter spaces, requires a prohibitively large number of samples due to the curse of dimensionality). Avoiding the computation of the sample mean significantly reduces the training time in high dimensional parameter spaces compared to previous literature results. Under this new formulation, we establish a new theoretical result for the approximation of the posterior mean and covariance for general mathematical problems. We validate the effectiveness of UQ-VAEs through three benchmark numerical tests: a Poisson inverse problem, a non affine inverse problem and a 0D cardiocirculatory model, under the two clinical scenarios of systemic hypertension and ventricular septal defect. For the latter case, we perform forward uncertainty quantification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tonini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e3b8a7d58c25ebb1baehttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.11174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improvements on uncertainty quantification with variational autoencoders2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Uncertainty quantification for goal-oriented inverse problems via variational encoder-decoder networks2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Remedying uncertainty representations in visual inference through Explaining-Away Variational Autoencoders2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Invertible neural networks for uncertainty quantification in refraction tomography2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Uncertainty Quantification for Forward and Inverse Problems of PDEs via Latent Global Evolution2024 · 3 citations