PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Parallel reactions on a single T cell receptor offer a robust kinetic proofreading mechanism

View Full Paper
SMShumpei MoritaJGJay T. Groves

Key Points

  • The study shows that parallel reactions on a T cell receptor increase discrimination fidelity.
  • Key evidence indicates that multiple ITAM domains facilitate parallel reactions, improving TCR performance.
  • This analysis features a revised kinetic proofreading scheme based on parallel reactions in a stochastic setting.
  • The findings imply that this multithread approach could simplify the physical implementation of TCR mechanisms.

Abstract

T cells can recognize a few molecules of cognate antigen among vastly outnumbering noncognate ligands. The T cell receptor (TCR) differentiates antigens based on antigen–TCR binding dwell time through a kinetic proofreading process. Historically, this has been modeled as the ligated receptor undergoing a series of reactions before producing a signal. In such a sequential mechanism, the number of steps is a key determinant of discrimination fidelity. Here, we consider two features of the molecular mechanism of TCR activation that diverge from a sequential process and suggest that an alternative kinetic proofreading mechanism may be at play. First, activation processes of multiple ITAM domains of the TCR represent parallel reaction sequences taking place on a single TCR molecule. Second, the states of the parallel proofreading reactions are integrated to produce a binary output from each TCR in the form of a discrete LAT condensation event, which may or may not occur. We examine a revised kinetic proofreading scheme based on parallel reactions followed by an integration step (multithread scheme) and compare its performance with the sequential scheme in a stochastic setting. A distinct difference in a multithread scheme is that multiplicity of the parallel reaction threads provides an additional means to increase discrimination fidelity. This relieves the need for fine-tuned kinetics among chemically distinct reaction steps, which is a major hurdle for physical implementation of a sequential mechanism. Lastly, we reinterpret previously reported experimental observations and find that various proofreading behaviors are well described as proofreading through parallel reaction threads.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morita et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e3f8a7d58c25ebb1f11https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514057122
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proofreading and single-molecule sensitivity in T-cell receptor signaling by condensate nucleation2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Reliable ligand discrimination in stochastic multistep kinetic proofreading: First passage time vs. product counting strategies2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Differential Roles of Kinetic On- and Off-Rates in T-Cell Receptor Signal Integration Revealed with a Modified Fab’-DNA Ligand2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Reliable ligand discrimination in stochastic multistep kinetic proofreading: First passage time vs. product counting strategies2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Differential roles of kinetic on- and off-rates in T-cell receptor signal integration revealed with a modified Fab’-DNA ligand2024 · 5 citations