PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Eastern African Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Households’ Involvement in State and Non-State Actors’ Initiatives Towards Flood Disaster Risk Reduction Within Informal Settlements in Nairobi City County

View Full Paper
HMHesbon Nyagaka MosioriFMFerdinand Nabiswa MakhanuNNNamenya Daniel Naburi

Key Points

  • Findings reveal only 2.0% of households exhibit active involvement in flood disaster risk reduction activities despite high flood risk awareness.
  • Correlation analysis shows strong linkages (r=0.882, p<0.01) between training and preparedness kits, indicating integrated interventions are necessary.
  • Low ownership of emergency kits and proactive measures at 19.5% and 17.0%, reflecting a knowledge-action gap in disaster preparedness efforts.
  • Structural barriers like tenure insecurity and lack of resources significantly hinder household participation in disaster risk reduction programs.

Abstract

Household involvement in disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been identified as an essential foundation of resilience. However, empirical evidence on the levels and quality of household involvement is limited in terms of awareness, mobilisation, and response. This study evaluated household involvement in flood disaster risk reduction (DRR) programmes in informal settlements (Kibra and Mathare) of Nairobi City County, Kenya, among state and non-state actors using a mixed-methods approach. Data were collected from 455 respondents comprising 398 household heads, 42 community leaders, ten non-state and five state actors using the use of questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and photography. Findings show low levels of household involvement in six DRR activities (49.2-64.0% saying they were involved in none), preparedness kits (64.0%), and training/drills (61.4%). Slight involvement is the highest at 46.2% and active involvement is low at 8 or less than 2.0%. Qualitative insights reveal exclusion from top-down planning, loss of trust, and motivation. Correlation analysis reveals strong linkages of inter-activity (training and preparedness kits, r=0.882, p<0.01), suggesting integrated interventions, which amplify involvement. Despite the high level of flood risk awareness (61.9%), the proportion with emergency kits and adopting proactive measures is low (19.5% and 17.0% respectively), highlighting the knowledge-action gap. Preparedness is the highest in DRR performance, followed by recovery, mitigation, and response. Structural barriers, tenure insecurity, and lack of resources are barriers to involvement. The study recommends the use of participatory approaches, integration of local champions, and incentives such as technical support to build resilience in communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mosiori et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e3f8a7d58c25ebb20a5https://doi.org/10.58721/eajhss.v4i2.1338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenges Encountered During Disaster Risk Reduction Initiatives in the Informal Settlements of Nyeri Town2025
  2. 2Flood Disaster Preparedness and Safeguard of Livelihoods in Garissa County, Kenya2025
  3. 3Assessing The Role of Land Use Change in Flood Risk and Community-Based Preparedness in Mitigating Disaster Risk in Dilimi Catchment2026
  4. 4Flood risk perception, awareness, and preparedness behaviours among vulnerable population groups: implications for building community resilience2025
  5. 5Flood risk perception, awareness, and preparedness behaviours among vulnerable population groups: implications for building community resilience2025 · 2 citations