PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Geoscientific model development3 citationsOpen Access

Impact of topography and meteorological forcing on snow simulation in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC)

View Full Paper
LWLibo WangLMLawrence MudrykJMJoe R. Melton

Key Points

  • The alternate snow cover fraction parameterization significantly improves snow simulation in CLASSIC, particularly in mountainous areas.
  • Improvement metrics include a 75% reduction in annual mean bias and a 32% enhancement in unbiased root mean squared error.
  • Using multiple meteorological datasets reveals substantial variability in snow simulation results, particularly without bias correction.
  • The research highlights the critical role of topography and precise meteorological forcing in accurately modeling snow dynamics.

Abstract

Abstract. Our study evaluates the impacts of an alternate snow cover fraction (SCF) parameterization on snow simulation in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC). Three reanalysis-based meteorological datasets are used to drive the model to account for uncertainties in the forcing data. While the default parameterization assumes a simple linear relationship between SCF and snow depth with no dependence on topography, the alternate parameterization accounts for the topographic effects of sub-grid terrain on SCF. We show that the alternate parameterization improves SCF simulated in CLASSIC during winter and spring in mountainous areas for all three choices of meteorological datasets. Annual mean bias, unbiased root mean squared area, and correlation improve by 75 %, 32 %, and 7 % when evaluated with MODIS SCF observations over the Northern Hemisphere. We also demonstrate that the improvements to simulated SCF lead to further improvements in variables related to surface radiation, energy fluxes, and the water cycle. Finally, we link relative biases in the meteorological forcing data to differences in simulated snow water equivalent and SCF. Assessment of simulations with different combinations of SCF parameterizations and meteorological datasets reveals the large impact of meteorological forcing on snow simulation in CLASSIC. Two out of the three meteorological datasets were bias-adjusted using observation-based datasets. However, simulations forced by the dataset without bias correction outperform relative to simulations forced by datasets with bias correction, suggesting that there are large uncertainties in the observation-based datasets and/or methods used for bias correction. This study underscores the importance of accounting for topographic effects of sub-grid terrain and accurate meteorological forcing on snow simulation in land surface models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc26188a7d58c25ebb274ahttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6597-2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper