PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting Studies15 citationsOpen Access

Detecting Financial Fraud in Real-Time Transactions Using Graph Neural Networks and Anomaly Detection Techniques

View Full Paper
RZRasheed ZakariaMRMohammad Mahmudur Rahman‬MCME Choudhury

Key Points

  • A lightweight graph neural network produces embeddings on the fly for real-time anomaly detection and fraud classification.
  • Real-time fraud detection uses techniques like streaming reweighting and adaptive thresholds to deal with class imbalance.
  • The method shows consistent gains over traditional rule-based methods, particularly in low-footprint fraud detection.
  • Local explanations through subgraph rationales support analyst reviews and meet regulatory requirements.

Abstract

Real-time fraud detection must balance accuracy with millisecond-level latency as adversaries evolve tactics across accounts, devices, merchants, and networks. This paper presents a streaming framework that models payment ecosystems as dynamic, heterogeneous graphs and detects anomalies by fusing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with online anomaly detectors. Incoming transactions update a temporal multi-relational graph (card–device–merchant–IP), from which a lightweight GNN (GraphSAGE/GAT variants with edge features and time encoding) produces embeddings on the fly. These embeddings feed (a) a cost-sensitive classifier for known fraud and (b) unsupervised detectors (e.g., Isolation Forest/Deep SVDD) to surface novel, label-sparse attacks. To cope with class imbalance and concept drift, we employ streaming reweighting, adaptive thresholds tuned on precision@k, and continual learning via replay and drift triggers. The system exposes local explanations (subgraph rationales via GNNExplainer/motif scores) to support analyst review and regulatory needs, while a deployment blueprint (feature cache, micro-batching, and asynchronous inference) meets <50–100 ms decision budgets. We evaluate on mixed synthetic/industry datasets with evolving fraud scenarios, reporting ROC-AUC/PR-AUC, detection delay, alert volume, and business impact under cost constraints. Results show consistent gains over rule-based, tabular ML, and static graph baselines, particularly for low-footprint fraud and fast-moving attack campaigns. The proposed design offers a practical path to accurate, auditable, and scalable fraud screening in production payment streams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zakaria et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd89defe798ba2fc497b3dhttps://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2025.7.6.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI-Driven Fraud Detection in Financial Transactions with Graph Neural Networks and Anomaly Detection2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2Real-time transaction flow analysis with graph neural networks for financial fraud detection2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3AI-Driven Anomaly Detection for Financial Fraud A Hybrid Approach Using Graph Neural Networks and Time-Series Analysis2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Real-Time Transaction Fraud Detection Using Ensemble Learning and Graph Neural Networks2026
  5. 5Real-time dynamic graph learning with temporal attention for financial fraud detection2026 · 3 citations