PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Future Internet2 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating Learning Success, Engagement, and Usability of Moalemy: An Arabic Rule-Based Chatbot

View Full Paper
DADangin AlKAKhalid Alomar

Key Points

  • The adaptive method displayed higher user satisfaction, indicating its effectiveness compared to the static method.
  • Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in user engagement and satisfaction, notably favoring the adaptive method.
  • The study utilized a 2 × 3 within-subject experimental design across varying task difficulties to evaluate the chatbot's effectiveness.
  • While learning outcomes showed no significant differences, the adaptive chatbot proved more efficient at specific difficulty levels.

Abstract

A rule-based chatbot is a type of chatbot that responds by matching users’ queries with pre-defined rules. In e-learning, chatbots can enhance the learning experience by assisting teachers in delivering learning materials pleasantly. This research introduces Moalemy, an Arabic rule-based chatbot designed to provide a personalized learning experience by tailoring educational content to each learner’s prior knowledge. This empirical study evaluates learning outcomes, user engagement, and system usability using both subjective and objective metrics. It compares the effectiveness of a proposed Arabic rule-based chatbot with adaptive personalization to that of a static, non-personalized chatbot. The comparison was conducted across three levels of task difficulty (easy, medium, and hard) using a 2 × 3 within-subject experimental design with 34 participants. Descriptive statistics revealed higher mean values of usability and engagement in the adaptive method. Although the analysis revealed no significant variations in learning outcomes and SUS scores, it showed statistically significant differences in user satisfaction in favor of the adaptive method, p = 0.003. Analyses showed no significant differences between the two learning methods in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and engagement. Across difficulty levels, the adaptive method outperforms the static method in terms of efficiency and effectiveness at the medium level, and in engagement at the easy level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Al et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91d5fe798ba2fc498f33https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17100449
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper