PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025University of Pittsburgh Law Review0 citationsOpen Access

Newer Problems in an Old, Broken Campaign Finance Regime—a Post-2024 Reflection

View Full Paper
JMJohn Martin

Key Points

  • The 2024 election cycle introduced several new challenges in the campaign finance landscape, impacting political dynamics.
  • Notably, cash-for-donations schemes and social media moderation tactics disrupted traditional fundraising efforts.
  • The issues stemming from self-funding and foreign-influenced corporations indicate the need for reform in campaign finance regulations.
  • Potential legislative solutions are proposed to address these issues within existing campaign finance jurisprudence.

Abstract

Money in politics is ever-increasing in the United States, and the ways in which it manifests are ever-changing. The 2024 election cycle was no different in this regard, with numerous unique issues in campaign finance arising. The election now being over, a retrospection of these newer problems seems due. This Essay provides just that. Among the issues discussed are cash-for-donations schemes, cash-forregistration schemes, the use of social media moderation to block opponent fundraising (i.e., “contra-butions”), the leveraging of self-funding for vicepresidential nomination, the growth in candidate self-loaning post-FEC v. Cruz, and the uncertain future of laws targeting foreign-influenced corporations. With each issue, I offer potential legislative and doctrinal fixes (within the bounds of present campaign finance jurisprudence).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Martin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91dafe798ba2fc4994achttps://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2025.1098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper