PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Jurnal Meta Hukum0 citations

THE RIGHT TO IMMUNITY AGAINST NOTARIES DUE TO LAWSUITS AGAINST DEEDS OF GRANT THAT VIOLATE THE LEGITIMACY OF THE PORTION (Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number 2892 K/Pdt/2021)

View Full Paper
DHDewi Estri Jayanti HarahapDSDani Sintara

Key Points

  • The Supreme Court ruling affirms that deeds of gift violating legitime portie are initially void but can be canceled.
  • In practice, gifts remain valid until challenged by affected heirs, as seen in Supreme Court decision 2892 K/Pdt/2021.
  • Legal action against a deed of gift violating legitieme portie allows the injured party to seek remedies within the bounds of law.
  • Gifts in violation can lead to disputes among heirs, stressing the importance of adhering to civil codes regarding inheritance.

Abstract

The act of giving during life or commonly called a grant by the testator that violates the legitimacy of the testator's legitimacy is often a problem because the act is an unlawful act so that the grant deed is canceled. The results of the research and discussion show that the legal position of a deed of gift made before a notary that violates the legitime portie is that the deed of gift is considered null and void by law by itself and is considered to have no binding force from the start. However, in practice, a deed of gift is valid even if it contains a violation of the legitime portie of the heir, as long as it has not been canceled by the injured heir, so that its nature is no longer null and void but can be canceled. The legal remedy of the injured party against a deed of gift that violates the legitime portie is to take legal action to sue. In principle, a gift cannot be canceled or withdrawn. Analysis of the judge's decision regarding the deed of gift that violates the legitime portie in the Supreme Court decision Number 2892 K/Pdt/2021 is a deed of gift made before Notary Sabrina Askandar Tjokroprawiro, contrary to the provisions of the legitieme portie (absolute share) of the heirs as regulated in Article 913 of the Civil Code.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harahap et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de5da783cbc991d0a20d90https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i1.771
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper