PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Neurosurgical FOCUS2 citationsOpen Access

Embolization of the middle meningeal artery as a nonsurgical option for chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective matching study

View Full Paper
AMArwed Elias MichaelJRJana RedikerUKUlrich J. Knappe

Key Points

  • No complications were found in patients receiving middle meningeal artery embolization, while surgery involved complications in some cases.
  • The study involved 51 patients, comparing those treated with embolization against those treated surgically.
  • The research includes a prospective matching analysis to better evaluate outcomes based on specific criteria.
  • Findings suggest that middle meningeal artery embolization may offer a viable treatment alternative for chronic subdural hematoma, with considerations for further research.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a treatment option in addition or as an alternative to conservative or surgical therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether MMAE can be used as a primary treatment method in patients with CSDH without an acute indication for surgery, and as a therapeutic option instead of a reoperation in cases of recurrence after surgery. METHODS Fifty-one patients with MMAE as the primary treatment method for CSDH or for cases of recurrence after surgical treatment were prospectively included. A retrospective matching with patients treated only surgically was performed using the criteria of age, gender, size and side of the CSDH, as well as anticoagulation therapy. In the follow-up, the frequency of rescue operations and complications and the resumption of anticoagulation treatment were analyzed. RESULTS Eleven patients with MMAE and 14 controls underwent rescue surgery due to relevant worsening of symptoms (p = 0.638). None of the patients with MMAE experienced a complication, compared with 7 of the controls (p = 0.012). When anticoagulation treatment was resumed, there was a tendency in favor of MMAE (p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS There is a tendency toward superiority of MMAE for CSDH in certain patients. However, uncertainties remain regarding the exact methodology and optimal indications, and further research will be needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michael et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de68e583cbc991d0a20efahttps://doi.org/10.3171/2025.7.focus25275
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper