PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Small5 citations

Deprotonation‐Resistant Bimolecular Passivation Strategy for 26% Efficient and Stable Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

View Full Paper
XWXiling WuCTCongcong TianJCJingyu Cai

Key Points

  • Enhanced perovskite solar cells achieved an impressive PCE of 26.04%, indicating significant performance gains.
  • After 1100 hours of operation, encapsulated devices retained 91.2% original PCE, showcasing improved stability.
  • Using a dual-molecule passivation strategy, the deprotonation equilibrium constant was reduced by more than 10-fold.
  • The approach effectively combines 4-methylpyridine-3-sulfonic acid and ethanolamine hydrochloride for better performance.

Abstract

Abstract Surface passivation has significantly increased the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, the most advanced methods of surface passivation depend on ammonium ligands that can lose protons under light and heat. Here, a dual‐molecule approach for surface passivation is presented by combining 4‐methylpyridine‐3‐sulfonic acid (MPSA) with ethanolamine hydrochloride (EOACl). The sulfonic acid group of MPSA provides additional protons and thus prevents the loss of protons from ammonium cations. This method reduces the deprotonation equilibrium constant of the ligands by more than 10‐fold. At the same time, EOA⁺, with its strong molecular dipole (6.72 D) and high adsorption energy (Δ E = −2.68 eV), exhibits excellent field effect and chemical passivation. The enhanced perovskite solar cells achieved a PCE of 26.04%, with the encapsulated devices retaining 91.2% of their original PCE after 1100 h of MPPT operation. After 800 h of thermal aging in a dark, inert atmosphere at 85 °C, the efficiency also remained at 90.3%, showing much improved stability for practical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79595b556a9128e1a1cdhttps://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202505684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dual‐Interface Modification for Inverted Methylammonium‐Free Perovskite Solar Cells of 25.35% Efficiency with Balanced Crystallization2024 · 102 citations
  2. 2Efficient Charge Transport in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells via 2D/3D Ferroelectric Heterojunction2024 · 24 citations
  3. 3Ethylenediamine Vapors‐Assisted Surface Passivation of Perovskite Films for Efficient Inverted Solar Cells2023 · 23 citations
  4. 4Overcoming the carrier transport limitation in Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite films by using lamellar nickel oxide substrates2021 · 39 citations
  5. 5Depth-dependent defect manipulation in perovskites for high-performance solar cells2021 · 189 citations