PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025ICST Transactions on Security and Safety0 citationsOpen Access

Breaking the Loop: Adversarial Attacks on Cognitive-AI Feedback via Neural Signal Manipulation

View Full Paper
RDR. DhayaRKR. Kanthavel

Key Points

  • Neuro-adversarial perturbations caused a 30% drop in classification accuracy in cognitive-AI systems.
  • Using defense strategies like variational autoencoders improved accuracy to over 80% in the presence of attacks.
  • Adversarial machine learning techniques were employed to test the robustness of EEG datasets against manipulations.
  • The research highlights security vulnerabilities in brain-computer interfaces, calling for stronger protective measures.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) embedded with Artificial Intelligence (AI) have created powerful closed-loop cognitive systems in the fields of neurorehabilitation, robotics, and assistive technologies. However, these tightly bound systems of human-AI integration expose the system to new security vulnerabilities and adversarial distortions of neural signals.OBJECTIVES: The paper seeks to formally develop and assess neuro-adversarial attacks, a new class of attack vector that targets AI cognitive feedback systems through attacks on electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. The goal of the research was to simulate such attacks, measure the effects, and propose countermeasures. METHODS: Adversarial machine learning (AML) techniques, including Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), were applied to open EEG datasets using Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Transformer-based models. Closed-loop simulations of BCI-AI systems, including real-time feedback, were conducted, and both the attack vectors and the attacks countermeasure approaches (e.g., VAEs, wavelet denoising, adversarial detectors) were tested.RESULTS: Neuro-adversarial perturbations yielded up to 30% reduction in classification accuracy and over 35% user intent misalignment. Transformer-based models performed relatively better, but overall performance degradation was significant. Defense strategies such as variational autoencoders and real-time adversarial detectors returned classification accuracy to over 80% and reduced successful attacks to below 10%.CONCLUSION: The threat model presented in this paper is a significant addition to the world of neuroscience and AI security. Neuro-adversarial attacks represent a real risk to cognitive-AI systems by misaligning human intent and action with machine response. Mobile layer signal sanitation and detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dhaya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79595b556a9128e1a2ddhttps://doi.org/10.4108/eetss.v9i1.9502
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing EEG Signal Classifier Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks Using a Generative Adversarial Network Approach2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Adversarial sample detection for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Brain-to-AI Adaptive Feedback Systems: The Next Frontier of Human–Machine Symbiosis2025
  4. 4Neuro-Cybersecurity: Exploiting Neural Signal Patterns for Biometric Hacking and Defense2025
  5. 5Neuro-Cybersecurity: Exploiting Neural Signal Patterns for Biometric Hacking and Defense2025