PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Annals of Medicine4 citationsOpen Access

GnRH antagonist protocol versus long-acting GnRH agonist protocol on pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI: a retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
PZPanpan ZhaoXWXiliang WangQZQian Zhang

Key Points

  • The study compares pregnancy outcomes, finding differences between gnrh antagonist and gnrh agonist protocols.
  • Key evidence shows contrasting results in IVF and ICSI when using these two ovarian stimulation protocols.
  • Observational analysis of data from patients undergoing IVF/ICSI evaluates the effectiveness of both gnrh protocols.
  • These findings may influence treatment decisions for infertility, highlighting the importance of protocol selection.

Abstract

Background Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and long-acting GnRH agonist regimens are commonly employed for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), but their relative efficacy in improving pregnancy outcomes remains controversial. Previous studies has yielded conflicting results, leaving clinicians and researchers uncertain about which protocol is more favorable. Given the high prevalence of infertility and the importance of improving pregnancy outcomes for these patients, understanding the differences in the efficacy of these two protocols is crucial. Therefore, our study aims to conduct a direct comparison of pregnancy outcomes between patients using GnRH antagonist protocol or long-acting GnRH agonist protocol.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de796d5b556a9128e1ada0https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2564279
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper