PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Why Uncertainty Calibration Matters for Reliable Perturbation-based Explanations

View Full Paper
TDThomas DeckerVTVolker TrespFBFlorian Buettner

Key Points

  • Uncertainty calibration improves the reliability of model predictions when using perturbation-based explanations.
  • Tests reveal that models often generate inaccurate probability estimates with traditional explainability techniques.
  • The proposed ReCalX approach enhances model output alignment with human perception and object locations.
  • This method highlights the impact of reliable estimates for improving explanation quality in machine learning.

Abstract

Perturbation-based explanations are widely utilized to enhance the transparency of modern machine-learning models. However, their reliability is often compromised by the unknown model behavior under the specific perturbations used. This paper investigates the relationship between uncertainty calibration - the alignment of model confidence with actual accuracy - and perturbation-based explanations. We show that models frequently produce unreliable probability estimates when subjected to explainability-specific perturbations and theoretically prove that this directly undermines explanation quality. To address this, we introduce ReCalX, a novel approach to recalibrate models for improved perturbation-based explanations while preserving their original predictions. Experiments on popular computer vision models demonstrate that our calibration strategy produces explanations that are more aligned with human perception and actual object locations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Decker et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de84bf5b556a9128e1bf50https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.19630
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper