PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025BMC Cancer4 citationsOpen Access

Role of endocervical curettage in detecting CIN2 + in postmenopausal women with persistent high-risk HPV and type 3 transformation zone

View Full Paper
MBMaria Teresa BrunoUniversity of CataniaACAntonino Giovanni CavallaroUniversity of CataniaMSMaria Chiara SudanoUniversity of Catania

Key Points

  • CIN2 + prevalence reached 27.7%, while ≥CIN3 was observed in 19.0% of postmenopausal women.
  • Multivariable analysis revealed high-grade cytology and TZ3 were significantly associated with CIN2+ risk.
  • Endocervical curettage demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.7% and a negative predictive value of 88.5% for detecting CIN2+.
  • The study indicates a need for larger cohorts to confirm the relationship between non-16/18 HPV genotypes and CIN2+.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endocervical curettage (ECC) in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV-positive postmenopausal women with a type 3 transformation zone (TZ3) and to identify additional predictive factors. A retrospective observational study was conducted including 137 HPV-positive postmenopausal women who underwent colposcopy, ECC, and subsequent LEEP. Variables analyzed included age group, HPV genotype (16/18 vs. non-16/18), transformation zone type, cytology results, and ECC findings. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of CIN2 + confirmed by LEEP histology. CIN2 + prevalence was 27.7% (38/137); ≥CIN3 occurred in 26/137 (19.0%). In multivariable analysis, high-grade cytology (adjusted OR aOR 4.65; 95% CI 1.92–11.30; p < 0.001), TZ3 (aOR 3.05; 1.05–8.85; p = 0.040) and hrHPV non-16/18 (aOR 2.52; 1.08–5.90; p = 0.032) were independently associated with CIN2+, while age ≥ 51 years was not (aOR 1.28; 0.57–2.85; p = 0.55). Absolute risks of CIN2 + were 36.8% with non-16/18 vs. 16.4% with HPV16/18. ECC (cut-off CIN2+) yielded sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 77.8%, PPV 56.0% and NPV 88.5%. In postmenopausal women with persistent hrHPV, high-grade cytology and TZ3 are the main drivers of CIN2+ risk. ECC is most useful as a rule-out test (high NPV), whereas expedited diagnostic-therapeutic LEEP may be considered when ASC-H/HSIL coexists with TZ3 in women without fertility desire. The association between non-16/18 genotypes and CIN2+ observed here warrants confirmation in larger multicentre cohorts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruno et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dfe93cdaa1363beb049d6chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14868-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper