PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025African Journal of Social Issues1 citations

From cold war alliances to regional security complexes in Africa: ECOWAS and African Union’s security framework in perspective

View Full Paper
COCharles Akpochai Ohwo

Key Points

  • ECOWAS and the African Union have shifted from Cold War legacies to become key actors in regional security.
  • The study reveals that both organizations face challenges such as funding and political will, impacting their intervention capacity.
  • Using Regional Security Complex Theory, the analysis assesses institutional capacities and historical legacies influencing security.
  • Recommendations include improving coordination and enhancing financial autonomy to foster sustainable African-led security responses.

Abstract

There is an intriguing transformation in Africa's security path with the dismantling of Cold War geopolitics. Accordingly, Africa has, for a long time, been viewed as a chessboard, and the African states are increasingly asserting agency through regional security architectures. This study, with a focus on ECOWAS and the African Union, attempts to address the transition from externally imposed alliances to regionally rooted complexes with regard to security. The study draws attention to the significance of these institutions in dealing with issues of intra-state conflict, terrorism, and democratic backsliding. The study acknowledges that while ECOWAS and the AU have become quite progressive in areas such as peacekeeping and normative frameworks, yet, institutional incoherence, funding, and political will continue to stand as challenges. The study closes an important literature gap by undertaking a critical assessmentof how these bodies have moved beyond Cold War legacies to be critical actors on regional security. Using the Regional Security Complex Theory as its analytical framework, the study relies on secondary qualitative data to interrogate historical legacies, assess current institutional capacities, and identify key limitations. Findings reveal that while both organisations have demonstrated capacity for intervention, their efforts are hampered by external dependencies and weak internal mechanisms. The study recommends enhancing institutional capacity, improving coordination, and increasing financial autonomy to enable sustainable, African-ledsecurity responses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Charles Akpochai Ohwo (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e02f34f0e39f13e7fa21b6https://doi.org/10.4314/ajosi.v8i1.50
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The implications of the emergence of the alliance of Sahelian States for regional integration, stability and development in Africa2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2ECOWAS between great power rivalries and internal fragmentation: Navigating crises and shifting alliances in West Africa2026
  3. 3Coups, Regional Security Complexes and the Impact of Nigeria’s Peacekeeping in West Africa, 1960–20222024
  4. 4Regional security challenges in West Africa and the imperative for the ECOWAS military intervention2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Collective Security and the African Regional Integration2024