PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods2 citationsOpen Access

Improving Systematic Literature Reviews: A Narrative Guideline to Structure the Analysis Stage

View Full Paper
NNNtombiyokusa NyoniAMAnnlizé L. MarnewickCMCarl Marnewick

Key Points

  • Improving rigour during the analysis of systematic literature reviews increases the relevance of findings for practice.
  • Detailed guidelines for analysis aid researchers in addressing knowledge and research gaps effectively.
  • The study highlights the importance of targeted outcomes in deciding the analysis approach within systematic literature reviews.
  • Guidelines provided support practitioners and academics in making informed decisions based on structured SLR findings.

Abstract

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have been used in various disciplines to explore existing research on a particular topic. SLRs are important for identifying research gaps, providing guidelines for practice and informing policy. There are several guidelines for conducting SLRs which focus mainly on providing methodological steps to ensure rigour and transparency. The initial steps of a SLR have detailed guidance. However, the analysis and evaluation steps lacks detailed guidance leading to quality challenges of reporting of their findings. With rigour during the analysis of the SLR, the findings could become more logical and relevant to practice and policy-making. The purpose of this paper is to develop guidelines for conducting analysis and synthesis during a SLR to improve the relevance and use of the findings as a basis for policy-making, practice and academia. The analysis guideline will show how findings from the SLRs can inform the regulations and standards of the different fields or industries. The paper will show how analysis is conducted in such that it assists practitioners to make informed decisions and know actions that need to be taken in their fields or industries. Lastly, researchers in academia usually conduct SLRs, and this paper will guide them in how to conduct SLR analysis based on their purpose and targeted outcome. A narrative review was used to identify the patterns to improve rigour and transparency during the analysis of a SLR. The findings from the narrative review show that the analysis process depends on the purpose and the targeted outcome of the SLR. If the outcome of the SLR is to identify research gaps, publication metric analysis should be included because it assists in identifying contextual, population and methodological gaps. On the other hand, to identify knowledge gaps, concepts should be identified, effects and interconnections should be determined. An extensive analysis should also be conducted to build a model and framework. The guidelines provided in this paper should assist researchers in improving the analysis process of a SLR, leading to usable findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nyoni et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e034f7f0e39f13e7fa3148https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.23.2.4033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How to Undertake an Impactful Literature Review: Understanding Review Approaches and Guidelines for High-impact Systematic Literature Reviews2024 · 44 citations
  2. 2How to Write a Professional Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Speed Up Acceptance of Your Scientific Publication2026
  3. 3Reinvigorating the Notion of Becoming “Scholars Before Researchers”: Experiences With Systematic Literature Reviews2025
  4. 4Writing narrative style literature reviews2015 · 1,840 citations
  5. 5Guidelines and open-source toolbox for systematic literature reviews in the field of urbanism2024 · 3 citations