PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025Journal of Clinical Medicine5 citationsOpen Access

Predictors of Hemorrhage and Re-Intervention in Renal Angiomyolipoma Following Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

View Full Paper
ARAbinaya RamakrishnanDRDavid ReillyJSJames Sayre

Key Points

  • Tumor diameter >6.8 cm significantly predicts hemorrhage, with 84.6% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity.
  • Post-embolization tumor volume over 248 mL strongly predicts the need for repeat transcatheter arterial embolization.
  • Transcatheter arterial embolization significantly reduces tumor diameter by 33.5% and volume by 60%.
  • Clinical success rate of transcatheter arterial embolization for renal angiomyolipomas stood at 94%, with low complication rates.

Abstract

Purpose: Renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are benign renal neoplasms that may lead to spontaneous hemorrhage. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is a nephron-sparing treatment option, yet data on predictors of hemorrhage and re-intervention remain limited. This study evaluates clinical and radiologic outcomes of TAE and identifies predictors of hemorrhage and repeat embolization. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 66 patients (69 AMLs) undergoing TAE between 2010 and 2024 was conducted. Clinical, radiological, and procedural variables were analyzed. Tumor size, vascularity, and aneurysmal features were assessed pre- and post-embolization. Logistic regression models identified predictors of hemorrhage and repeat TAE. Results: Pre-treatment tumor diameter was the only significant predictor of hemorrhage (p = 0.011), with a threshold of 6.8 cm yielding 84.6% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity. All hemorrhagic tumors measured ≥4 cm. Post-embolization tumor volume predicted repeat TAE (p = 0.001), with a 248 mL cutoff. TAE significantly reduced tumor diameter (−33.5%) and volume (−60%) (p 6.8 cm is a strong predictor of hemorrhage, while larger post-embolization volumes predict the need for re-intervention. These findings challenge the conventional 4 cm treatment threshold and support more individualized management strategies incorporating tumor morphology and response to embolization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramakrishnan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e034fdf0e39f13e7fa3684https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196990
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper