PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 20250 citationsOpen Access

On the Worst-Case Complexity of Gibbs Decoding for Reed--Muller Codes

View Full Paper
XXX.-G. XiaNKNicholas KwanLWLele Wang

Key Points

  • The Gibbs decoder may require super-polynomial time for convergence in some scenarios, impacting efficiency.
  • Mixing time analysis demonstrates that certain sequences can hinder the Gibbs decoder's performance significantly.
  • Reed-Muller codes can achieve capacity on binary symmetric channels, but polynomial-time decoding remains an open issue.
  • Sampling from the posterior distribution is a proposed method for RM codes, but challenges in decoding persist.

Abstract

Reed--Muller (RM) codes are known to achieve capacity on binary symmetric channels (BSC) under the Maximum a Posteriori (MAP) decoder. However, it remains an open problem to design a capacity achieving polynomial-time RM decoder. Due to a lemma by Liu, Cuff, and Verd\'u, it can be shown that decoding by sampling from the posterior distribution is also capacity-achieving for RM codes over BSC. The Gibbs decoder is one such Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based method, which samples from the posterior distribution by flipping message bits according to the posterior, and can be modified to give other MCMC decoding methods. In this paper, we analyze the mixing time of the Gibbs decoder for RM codes. Our analysis reveals that the Gibbs decoder can exhibit slow mixing for certain carefully constructed sequences. This slow mixing implies that, in the worst-case scenario, the decoder requires super-polynomial time to converge to the desired posterior distribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e03501f0e39f13e7fa3958https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.00974
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper